Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1180 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2023
C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 31.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
and
C.M.P.No.1878 of 2023
Paramasivam (deceased)
1.Mrs.P.Pavunambal
2.Mrs.Lakshmi
3.Mrs.Thangamani
4.P.Tamilvanan
5.P.Dharmaraj ... Petitioners
Vs.
Rajamanickam ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure
Code, to set aside the order of Delivery of the property, Order passed by the
learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur in E.P.No.46 of 2014 in O.S.No.95 of
2004.
For Petitioners : Mr.B.S.Sundaramoorthy
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order of Delivery of
Possession passed by the Subordinate Court, Perambalur in E.P.No.46 of 2014 in
O.S.No.95 of 2004 dated 20.01.2023.
2. The revision petitioner is the judgment debtor and the respondent is the
decree holder. The Suit was instituted for Specific Performance in O.S.No.95 of
2004 and admittedly, the Suit decreed in favour of the respondent / plaintiff on
17.09.2007.
3. The revision petitioner / deceased defendant, Mr.A.Paramasivam filed an
Appeal Suit, which was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 28.08.2009.
Thereafter, he filed a Second Appeal in S.A.No.549 of 2010 and the said appeal
was filed with the Miscellaneous Petition to condone the delay and as of now, an
impleading petition was also filed and is pending.
4. The decree holder / plaintiff filed an Execution Petition in E.P.No.46 of
2014, which is pending for the past about eight (8) years. As per the Judgment of
the Supreme Court and the High Court, the execution proceedings are to be
disposed within a period of six (6) months and the decree holder must be allowed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
to enjoy the fruits of the decree and at no circumstances, the judgment debtor or
any other person shall be allowed to drag on the execution proceedings one way or
other to defeat the decree. Such a practice or an attempt by any party, at no
circumstances be appreciated, but to be thwarted by the Court concerned and at all
circumstances, the endeavour of the Court is to ensure that the execution
proceedings are disposed of within a period of six (6) months. In the present case,
unfortunately, the execution proceedings are pending for the past about eight (8)
years.
5. The Execution Court passed order on 20.01.2023, which is impugned in
the present Civil Revision Petition. Considering the facts in totality, the admitted
facts of the case is that the Suit was instituted in O.S.No.95 of 2004, seeking the
relief of Specific Performance and the Suit was decreed on 17.09.2007. The
revision petitioner / judgment debtor filed A.S.No.49 of 2008 on the file of the
Principal District Court, Perambalur, which was dismissed on 28.09.2009.
Thereafter, the judgment debtor / defendants filed a Second Appeal in S.A.No.549
of 2010 and admittedly, there is no interim stay granted by the High Court and the
Second Appeal in S.A.No.549 of 2010 is pending.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
6. The defendant died on 26.10.2018 and his legal heirs were brought on
record as the respondents 2 - 6 in the Execution Petition. Pertinently, the
Execution Court has executed the sale deed as per the decree dated 17.09.2007 in
favour of the decree holder. When the Execution Court executed the sale deed,
there is no scope for further interference by this Court in the present civil revision
proceedings.
7. After execution of the sale deed as per the decree dated 17.09.2007 in
favour of the decree holder, the Court further passed an order of delivery of
possession in favour of the decree holder by 20.01.2023. The present Civil
Revision Petition is filed against the order of delivery passed by the Trial Court
pursuant to the sale deed as per the decree dated 17.09.2007.
8. When the sale deed was executed pursuant to the decree, delivery of
possession is only consequential and the proposal now made on behalf of the
revision petitioners by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners that they will
settle the issues would deserve no merit consideration and as of now, the sale deed
was executed pursuant to the decree and delivery of possession is also ordered.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
This being the facts and circumstances, there is no acceptable reason for the
purpose of considering the Civil Revision Petition.
9. Accordingly, the order passed in E.P.No.46 of 2014 in O.S.No.95 of
2004 dated 20.01.2023 stands confirmed and the Civil Revision Petition in
C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023 stands rejected. Consequently, the connected
Miscellaneous Petition in C.M.P.No.1878 of 2023 stands dismissed.
31.01.2023 skr
Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes
To
The Subordinate Judge, Subordinate Court, Perambalur.
Copy to
Sub Assistant Registrar, AE Section, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
skr
C.R.P.Sr.No.13410 of 2023
31.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!