Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1166 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2023
W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014
and
M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014
M.Periyasamy ... Petitioner
/vs./
1.The Special Deputy Collector,
Revenue Court, Thiruchirappalli.
2.The Tahsildar,
Karur Taluk,
Karur District.
3.R.Vasanthi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling the records relating to the
proceedings of the 1st respondent made in A.P. No.7 of 2013/I.A.No.54 of 2013
dated 29.08.2013 and quash the same and consequently forbearing the 1st
Respondent to proceed further in A.P. No.7 of 2013 until the disposal of the Civil
suit pending in O.S.No.106 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif
Court, Karur.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan
For R1 & R2 : Mr.V.OM.Prakash
Government Advocate
For R3 : Mr.E.K.Kumaresan
ORDER
The writ petition is seeking for a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the
records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in A.P.No.7 of 2013 /
I.A.No.54 of 2013 dated 29.08.2013, to quash the same and consequently to
forbear the first respondent to proceed further in A.P. No.7 of 2013 until the
disposal of the suit in O.S.No.106 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District
Munsif Court, Karur.
2.Now it is brought to the notice of this Court that the suit in O.S.No.106 of
2013 has been disposed of by judgment and decree dated 10.10.2015 decreeing
the suit as prayed for in its entirety. Against the said judgment and decree, the
petitioner had preferred an appeal suit in A.S.No.33 of 2015 and the same has
been dismissed for default by a judgment and decree of the learned Principal
Subordinate Judge, Karur, on 23.09.2019.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is taking steps
to restore the said appeal suit.
4.Be that as it may, what has been challenged is simpliciter a notice issued
by the first respondent calling upon the petitioner to submit his explanation on the
appeal filed by the third respondent pending the suit filed by the third respondent
seeking for various declarations. The said suit has also been disposed of. Hence,
the prayer in the writ petition itself becomes infructuous.
5.However, now considering that the appeal has been filed as against the
order of the second respondent recording the tenancy in the name of the petitioner
based upon the lease deed, which has been declared to be null and void by an
appropriate civil Court, the record of tenancy by the Tahsildar itself becomes
void.
6.In view of the subsequent developments, I find no reason to entertain this
writ petition as prayed for by the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014.
The first respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal within a period of 12
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no
order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Speaking : Yes / No 30.01.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
mm
To
1.The Special Deputy Collector,
Revenue Court, Thiruchirappalli.
2.The Tahsildar,
Karur Taluk,
Karur District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014.
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
mm
W.P.(MD) No.7388 of 2014
30.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!