Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pechiammal vs The Sub Registrar
2023 Latest Caselaw 1139 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1139 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2023

Madras High Court
Pechiammal vs The Sub Registrar on 30 January, 2023
                                                                             W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022



                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED : 30.01.2023

                                                   CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                         W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022
                                                  and
                                    W.M.P(MD)Nos.22226 & 22228 of 2022

                Pechiammal                                                 ... Petitioner

                                                      Vs.

                1.The Sub Registrar,
                  Melur,
                  Tuticorin.

                2.Dravidamuthu
                3.Maharajan
                4.Sakthipandi                                              ... Respondents

                PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records
                relating to the proceedings of the impugned cancellation deed, dated
                07.07.2011, vide document number 2303/2011 on the file of the first
                respondent and the consequent impugned refusal slip in RFL/Melur
                Thoothukudi/105/2022, dated 28.11.2022, on the file of the first respondent and
                quash the same and further direct the first respondent to register the settlement
                deed presented by the petitioner in favour of her husband M.Balasubramaniyan
                in respect of property bearing Door No.28M/2 in T.S.No.2, Ward C, Block 82
                situated in Bryant Nagar 7th Street, Thoothukudi.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/8
                                                                              W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022




                                      For Petitioner    : Mr.K.Jeyamohan

                                      For R-1           : Mr.N.Satheeskumar
                                                          Additional Government Pleader
                                      For R-2 to R-4    : No appearance


                                                       ORDER

Heard the learned Counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned

Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent. The second respondent

is none other than the petitioner's father's first wife. The respondents 3 and 4

are the second respondent's sons born to the petitioner's father. The private

notice issued by the petitioner was received by the second respondent for

herself and on behalf of the third and fourth respondents. The Court notice

issued to the second and third respondents has been returned with an

endorsement 'Unclaimed'.

2. The writ petitioner's father Thiru.Murugan executed a settlement deed

in favour of the petitioner when she was a minor. The settlement deed was

executed on 25.11.1991 and registered as document No.2123/1991 on the file

of SRO Melur, Tuticorin. This document was unilaterally cancelled on

07.07.2011 (vide document No.2303/2011). To quash the registration of the

cancellation deed unilaterally executed and presented by the settlor, this writ

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022

petition has been filed. A further relief has also been sought for. On the strength

of the settlement deed dated 25.11.1991, the petitioner had executed a

settlement deed dated 28.11.2022 in favour of her husband. She presented a

sale for registration. The impugned refusal check slip came to be issued citing

the cancellation deed. Challenge to the impugned refusal check slip is the other

part of the writ prayer.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterated all the

contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and

called upon this Court to quash the registration of the cancellation deed as well

as the impugned resual check slip and grant relief as prayed for.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that this writ

petition is barred by laches. He pointed out that this Court in W.P(MD)No.

23577 of 2019 dated 05.06.2020 dismissed the writ petition, where challenge to

unilateral cancellation of the year 1994 was made. He submitted that if this

Court would intervene in the matter, it may possibly affect third party rights

that might have accrued in the meanwhile.

5. The private respondents have not appeared before this Court to oppose

the writ petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022

6. After carefully considering the objections of the learned Additional

Government Pleader, I am of view that the relief sought for in the writ petition

has to be granted. This is primarily for the reason that the issue raised by the

writ petition is no longer res integra. The Hon'ble Full Bench of the Madras

High Court in the decision reported in 2011 (2) CTC 1 (Latif Estate Line India

Limited Vs. Hadeeja Ammal and Others) had held that unilateral cancellation

of sale deed is illegal. The Hon'ble Full Bench judgment was rendered on

11.02.2011. Even though the decision of the Hon'ble Full Bench pertains only

to unilateral cancellation of a sale deed, still the underlying principle is

applicable to unilateral cancellation of other transactions also. Registration of

the cancellation deed in the instant case was made on 07.07.2011 (i.e.,) after the

Hon'ble Full Bench pronounced the judgment. Another Hon'ble Full Bench of

the Madras High Court in the decision reported in AIR 2022 Madras 323

(Sasikala Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and another) in paragraph No.58 has

held as follows:

"58. From the discussions and conclusions we have reached above with reference to various provisions of Statutes and precedents, we reiterate the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Thota Ganga Laxmi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, reported in (2010) 15 SCC 207 and the Full Bench of this Court in Latif Estate Line India Limited case, reported in AIR 2011 Mad 66 and inclined

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022

to follow the judgment of three member Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Veena Singh's case reported in (2022) 7 SCC 1 and the judgment of two member Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited case, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 544 for the following propositions:

(a) A sale deed or a deed of conveyance other than testamentary dispositions which is executed and registered cannot be unilaterally cancelled.

(b) Such unilateral cancellation of sale deed or a deed of conveyance is wholly void and non est and does not operate to execute, assign, limit or extinguish any right, title or interest in the property.

(c) Such unilateral cancellation of sale deed or deed of conveyance cannot be accepted for registration.

(d) The transferee or any one claiming under him or her need not approach the civil Court and a writ petition is maintainable to challenge or nullify the registration.

(e) However, an absolute deed of sale deed or deed of conveyance which is duly executed by the transferor may be cancelled by the civil Court at the instance of transferor as contemplated under Section 31 of Specific Relief Act.

(f) As regards gift or settlement deed, a deed of revocation or

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022

cancellation is permissible only in a case which fall under Section 126 of Transfer of Property Act and the Registering Authority can accept the deed of cancellation of gift for registration subject to the conditions specified in para 42 of this judgment.

(g) The legal principles above stated by us cannot be applied to cancellation of Wills or power of Attorney deed which are revocable and not coupled with interest."

7. The first respondent had erred in registering a deed of unilateral

cancellation. All the more so because, the settlement deed dated 25.11.1991

executed in favour of the writ petitioner contains a clause that the settlor has no

authority to change or revoke the settlement deed. In the face of such an

express stipulation, the first respondent could not have registered the document

dated 07.07.2011. I therefore, hold that the registration of the cancellation deed

dated 07.07.2011 (vide document No.2303/2011) is null and void.

8. Since the impugned refusal check slip is anchored entirely on the said

deed of cancellation, it also has to go as a matter of consequence. The

impugned refusal check slip dated 28.11.2020 is also set aside. The petitioner is

permitted to re-present the settlement deed dated 28.11.2022 before the first

respondent. The first respondent shall entertain the same, register it and release

it subject to the fulfillment of the other usual formalities. This writ petition

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022

stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.




                                                                              30.01.2023

                NCC               : Yes / No
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes / No
                Btr

                To

                The Sub Registrar,
                Melur,
                Tuticorin.




                                                                  G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                                   W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022


                                                                      Btr




                                           W.P(MD)No.28161 of 2022
                                                                 and
                                  W.M.P(MD)Nos.22226 & 22228 of 2022




                                                            30.01.2023




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter