Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Fathima Bibi vs Deputy Secretary To The
2023 Latest Caselaw 1103 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1103 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2023

Madras High Court
Fathima Bibi vs Deputy Secretary To The on 27 January, 2023
                                                                               W.P.No.33268 of 2015

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 27.01.2023

                                                         CORAM :

                                      The HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

                                                   W.P.No.33268 of 2015

                     Fathima Bibi                                                      .. Petitioner

                                                             vs

                     Deputy Secretary to the
                     Government of India,
                     Ministry of Home Affairs /
                     Grih Mantralaya (FFR Division),
                     2nd Floor, New Delhi City Centre,
                     Parliament Street, New Delhi – 110 001.                         .. Respondent



                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

                     praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to

                     sanction Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension to the petitioner's

                     husband from the date of his application i.e., 30.11.1988 to the

                     date of the petitioner's husband demise on 24.02.2002 and continue

                     to pay the Freedom fighters family pension to the petitioner from

                     25.02.2022.


                                  For Petitioner         :        Mr.T.Dhanasekaran

                                  For Respondent         :        Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan
                                                                  Deputy Solicitor General



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/5
                                                                                 W.P.No.33268 of 2015



                                                              ORDER

1. The petitioner is the widow of one Shri. Ismail Khan,

who was a freedom fighter for Indian independence. The petitioner

would state that her husband had participated in Quit India

Movement and in demonstrations conducted on 25.02.1946 aligning

with Royal Indian Naval Mutiny. He faced incarceration on several

occasions. The freedom fighter had applied on 30.11.1988 for grant

of Central Pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension

Scheme (in short 'the Scheme'). His application was duly

recommended by the State Government on 20.02.1989.

2. Despite recommendation of the State, the application

did not receive any consideration. The petitioner's husband passed

away on 24.02.2004. The petitioner thus moved a writ petition in

W.P.No.6543 of 2005 seeking a mandamus for grant of pension.

That writ petition came to be allowed on 16.06.2005 issuing

mandamus as sought for and directing the respondent to pay the

pension in accordance with law within sixty days from the date of

receipt of a copy of that order.

3. The State took the matter in writ appeal (W.A.No.2116

of 2005) which also came to be dismissed on 26.08.2011. Not

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.33268 of 2015

content with the dismissal, the matter was carried further in appeal

before the Supreme Court, which SLP also came to be rejected on

03.12.2012, though leaving the question of law open. With the

closure of the matter as aforesaid, the respondents have acceded to

the entitlement of the petitioner to pension and had sanctioned the

same vide order dated 20.02.2013.

4. It is the stand of the petitioner that she is entitled to

such pension from the date of application being 30.11.1988,

whereas the respondents would rely on the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and another v

Kaushalaya Devi reported ((2007) 9 SCC 525) to the effect that

pension is payable only on, and from the date of sanction, being

20.02.2013.

5. This question can well be decided based on the ratio of

the subsequent judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Union of India and others v Kashiswar Jana ((2008) 11 SCC 309) to

the effect that the grant of pension is to be on and from the date of

the order of the High Court, in case where such an order has been

passed, sanctioning the same.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.33268 of 2015

6. In this case, the relevant order would be the order

passed in W.P.6543 of 2005, dated 16.06.2005. Hence the

petitioner is entitled for pension for the period from 16.06.2005 till

the date of sanction being 20.02.2013 to be quantified and paid

over within a period of two weeks from date of receipt of a copy of

this order. This writ petition is allowed. No costs.

27.01.2023

Index:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes ssm

Note to Registry : Issue copy on 30.01.2023.

To

The Deputy Secretary Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs / Grih Mantralaya (FFR Division), 2nd Floor, New Delhi City Centre, Parliament Street, New Delhi – 110 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.33268 of 2015

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.

ssm

W.P.No.33268 of 2015

27.01.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter