Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1089 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2023
Crl.OP.No.1483 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2023
E.Saravanan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Office of Avadi Commissionerate,
Avadi, Chennai – 54.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Anti-Land Grabbing Cell,
Avadi, Chennai – 54. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
directing the respondents to register the case against the named persons
specified in the complaint of the petitioner dated 07.11.2022 pending with the
second respondent.
For Petitioner : Ms.H.Kalpana
For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh
Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to
register the case against the named persons specified in the complaint of the
petitioner dated 07.11.2022 pending with the second respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1483 of 2023
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is
the managing / founding Trustee of “Hare Krishna Seva Trust”. The accused in
the complaint dated 07.11.2022 are Jayabal, Vengatesan, Venkataraman,
Subramaniyan, Vignesh, Eagambaram, Subramani and Kodeeswaran had
conspired together and created the documents to show that the petitioner is
removed from managing trusteeship of Hare Krishna Seva Trust by
impersonation and forging the documents. Despite giving the complaint in this
regard, no F.I.R. was registered so far.
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents
submitted that the petitioner complaint is now forwarded to Anti-Land
Grabbing Cell, CCB, Chennai. They would enquire the matter and take
appropriate action.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondent.
5. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1483 of 2023
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge
Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after
relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court
cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene
only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the
fact that the complaint is now being enquired, the Investigation officer is
directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar
Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is made out,
the respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the
complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed
of.
27.01.2023
Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order Neutral Citation Case: Yes/No rap/sma
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1483 of 2023
To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of Avadi Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai – 54.
2. The Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Cell, Avadi, Chennai – 54.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1483 of 2023
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.
rap
Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2023
27.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!