Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 17562 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2023
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.16505 of 2023
Chandrapushpam ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police,
Tisyanvilai Police Station,
Tirunelveli District.
2.Gnanam @ Gnana Selvam
3.Mahesh
4.Devi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C, to transfer the case in C.C.No.430 of 2020 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram to nearby any other Court.
For petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan
For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R2 to R4 : Mr.R.Ponkarthikeyan
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to transfer the case in C.C.No.
430 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Radhapuram to
any other Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
2.The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner made a
complaint against the third and fourth respondents. On completion of the
investigation, charge sheet was filed. The accused are facing charges
under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu
Prohibition of Women Harassment Act altered @ 294(b), 342, 323, 325,
506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment
of Women Act. During the course of trial process, the petitioner noticed
some errors in the deposition. Despite the said mistakes are brought to
the knowledge of the Presiding Officer, those corrections were not
carried out. Later, the petitioner came to know that the third respondent
is a practicing Advocate and the Presiding Officer is supporting the third
respondent. Hence, the petitioner seeks for transfer of this petition.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
first respondent submits that the trial has been completed and the case is
posted for examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.. At the
fag end of the trial process, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking
transfer of this case.
4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
5.Admittedly, the trial has been completed. For the purpose of
hearing the arguments and pronouncing the judgment, the case cannot be
transferred to some other Court. If some corrections are to be done in the
deposition, the petitioner is always at liberty to approach the trial Court
itself for making proper correction in the deposition. But, without
approaching the trial Court, the petitioner has filed the present petition
making allegations against the Presiding Officer without any reasonable
ground.
6.I find absolutely no reason to interfere with the trial at the fag
end of the trial process. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is
dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.12.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
G.ILANGOVAN. J.
ta
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Tisyanvilai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21062 of 2023
22.12.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!