Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16120 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
W.A.(MD) No.846 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
W.A.(MD) No.846 of 2020
U.Rajeswaran ... Appellant
-vs-
1.The Commissioner
Commissionerate of Land Reforms
Ezhilagam, Chepauk
Chennai-600 005
2.The Special Officer
Tamilnadu Boomi Dhana Board
Chennai-5
3.The District Collector
Sivagangai District
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Sivagangai
5.The Thasildar
Karaikudi ... Respondents
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.846 of 2020
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the
order, dated 31.08.2020, passed in W.P.(MD) No.10478 of 2020, on the file of
this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Vijayarathinam
For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan
Government Advocate
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single
Judge, dated 31.08.2020, passed in W.P.(MD) No.10478 of 2020.
2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by
the appellant as infructuous by recording the submission of the learned
Additional Government Pleader that the representation submitted by the
appellant / writ petitioner was rejected by the Tahsildar, Karaikudi, vide
proceedings dated 29.08.2020.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the above
proceedings dated 29.08.2020 is nothing but a notice informing the appellant
to participate in the process of enquiry.
4. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents
contended that the subject property falls under the Tamil Nadu Boomi Dhana
Board. In respect of the properties falling under the Tamil Nadu Boomi Dhana
Board, the Commissioner of Land Reforms is the competent authority and
therefore, the Tahsildar cannot conduct adjudication of the issues.
5. Though the appellant sent a representation to the
Commissioner of Land Reforms, it was a common representation
communicated to all the authorities. Thus, the appellant is at liberty to
submit a fresh representation along with the documents, if any, in a
prescribed format setting out the facts, to the Commissioner of Land Reforms,
who on receipt of the same, shall conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate
orders on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
6. With the above direction, the writ appeal is disposed of. No
costs.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
11.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
krk
To:
1.The Commissioner,
Commissionerate of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
2.The Special Officer, Tamilnadu Boomi Dhana Board, Chennai-5.
3.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai.
5.The Thasildar, Karaikudi.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
krk
11.12.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!