Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mani vs Rathinagiri Rural Hospital Society
2023 Latest Caselaw 15739 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15739 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Madras High Court

Mani vs Rathinagiri Rural Hospital Society on 6 December, 2023

Author: M. Dhandapani

Bench: M. Dhandapani

                                                                              C.M.A.No.4580 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 06.12.2023

                                                       CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI

                                               C.M.A.No.4580 of 2019

                     Mani                                               ... Appellant

                                                         Vs.

                     1.Rathinagiri Rural Hospital Society,
                       Rathinagiri,
                       Walajah Taluk,
                       Vellore District.

                     2.Mahendiran                                       ... Respondents


                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Decree and Judgment dated 30.04.2015
                     made in M.C.O.P.No.484 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident
                     Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Vellore.


                                     For Appellant     : Mr.C.Prabakaran
                                     For Respondents   : Mr.V.Parivallal [R1]
                                                         Not ready in Notice [R2]
                                                         *****




                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.M.A.No.4580 of 2019

                                                       JUDGEMENT

The appellant/claimant has preferred the present appeal on the

ground that the Tribunal has fastened the liability as against the second

respondent, instead of first respondent.

2. As per the claim petition, on 06.09.2010 at about 7.30 hours,

when the claimant was riding his bicycle on the Vellore to

Thiruvannamalai Raod, near Thuthipet S.P.Hotel, the second respondent

driven the ambulance van bearing Regn.No.TN-23-X-7477, which was

owned by the first respondent, in a rash and negligent manner and

dashed against the claimant, thereby the claimant fell down and sustained

grievous injuries all over his body. Immediately, he was admitted in

Government Hospital, Adukkamparai. Thereafter, the claimant filed a

claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the

injuries sustained by him.

3. Before the Tribunal, the claimant examined himself as P.W.1

and examined the doctor as P.W.2 and marked 8 documents viz., Ex.P.1

to Ex.P.8. On the side of the respondents, they have examined one

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

witness viz., R.W.1 and marked 7 documents viz., Ex.R.1 to Ex.R.7.

After adjudication, the Tribunal passed an award awarding a sum of

Rs.2,02,951/- as compensation directing the second respondent to pay the

said compensation to the claimant. Challenging the same, the claimant is

before this Court.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that,

the registration of the offending vehicle stands in the name of the first

respondent, however, subsequently, the first respondent sold the same in

favour of the second respondent and the second respondent not taken any

effective steps to register the same with the Motor Vehicle Department.

At the time of accident, the vehicle stands in the name of the first

respondent, however, the Tribunal erroneously fixed liability as against

the second respondent, which is wholly unsustainable. Accordingly, he

prays for allowing the appeal.

5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first

respondent submitted that, the first respondent is a charitable trust,

namely Rathinagiri Rural Hospital Society and they alienated the entire

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

materials in favour of the second respondent vide agreement dated

04.07.2011, in which, the second respondent entered contract with the

Founder of the first respondent and the second respondent purchased the

van in a good running condition on 20.05.2009. Accordingly, executed

delivery note and sale receipt in favour of the first respondent and the

second respondent undertaken that he is the absolute owner and in

possession of the vehicle from 20.05.2009. Further, he submitted that the

accident had happened on 06.09.2010. Though the first respondent has

not taken any steps to mutate the records for transfer of ownership, the

Tribunal by considering all the oral and documentary evidence, has

rightly fixed the liability as against the second respondent, which is

wholly sustainable and the same does not require any interference.

Accordingly, he prays for dismissal of the appeal.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent and also

perused the materials available on record.

7. The factum and manner of the accident is not in dispute.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Therefore, this Court is not entering into said aspect. The only grievance

of the appellant is with regard to fixation of liability as against the second

respondent. It is pertinent to note that the appellant/claimant has no

locus-standi to file the present appeal questioning the liability fastened by

the Tribunal as against the second respondent, since he is not an

aggrieved person. Further, as per Section 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, initial

burden lies on the transferor to inform the registering authority within

whose jurisdiction to transfer has to be effected within 14 days from the

date of transfer, report the effect of the transfer. In the case on hand, the

first respondent has intimated about the transfer to the registering

authority, however, it is established on the first respondent that they have

sold the vehicle to the second respondent and the possession of the

vehicle was taken over the second respondent on 20.05.2009 itself.

Hence, it is the duty of the second respondent to apply the name transfer

before the registering authority within 30 days as contemplated under

Section 50 of Motor Vehicles Act. Therefore, the Tribunal has held that

the second respondent was the owner of the vehicle at the time of

accident and fixed the liability on the second respondent, which cannot be

said to be erroneous. Hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

award passed by the Tribunal.

8. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and

the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2015 made in M.C.O.P.No.484 of

2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial

Magistrate Court, Vellore is confirmed. No costs.




                                                                                       06.12.2023
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Speaking order / Non-speaking order
                     Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No
                     sp

                     To

                     1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                       Chief Judicial Magistrate Court,
                       Vellore.

                     2.The Section Officer,
                       V.R.Section,
                       High Court, Madras.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis





                                   M.DHANDAPANI, J.,

                                                          sp









                                              06.12.2023





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter