Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9855 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023
Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 08.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
1.S.Somasundaram @ Somu (A-8)
2.Malaysian Social Services (A-10)
Rep. by its President, Smt. Vatsala
.. Petitioner in all Cases
Vs.
State by:
Inspector of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),
Anti-Corruption Branch,
Chennai.
..Respondent in all cases
COMMON PRAYER : Criminal Revision Petitions have been filed under sections 397 & 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the conviction and sentence passed against the Petitioners in Crl.A. Nos.131, 132 & 111 of 2019, dated 25.04.2023 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions, Chennai confirming the judgment in C.C. Nos.24, 25 & 26 of 2010 dated 12.02.2019 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Santhanakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor (CBI)
COMMON ORDER These three Revision Petitions are directed against concurrent
findings of the Courts below held the Revision Petitioners guilty of
offence under Sections 120-B, 419, 468 r/w 471 IPC.
2. This is a case of kidnapping of three minor children for giving
adoption to childless couples in foreign. Malaysian Social Services
(shortly known as 'MSS') is an organization for taking abandoned
children and give them for adoption to foreign couples. They are
supposed to follow the procedures laid under the Central Adoption
Resource Agency (CARA) guidelines. However to keep their business
profitable, they have engaged agents who could kidnap children and
create fake documents as if they are abandoned or their biological parents
are ready to give adoption.
3. In the said process, Revision Petitioner S.Somasundaram @
Somu who is an associate to the MSS organization, had monitored the
kidnapping of hapless children and made fake documents of surrender
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
certificate, took the children to pediatrician Doctor to get health
certificate and also created affidavit in the non-judicial stamp paper to
make the process of adoption in compliance with CARA guidelines.
4. The crime came into light when a Writ Petition filed before this
Court alleging that children are illegally given in adoption to foreign
parents floating CARA guidelines. A Division Bench of this Court vide
order dated 04.09.2007 in a batch of HCP directed CBI, Southern Zone,
to investigate whether any fraud committed on the Court by way of
impersonation or by creating false and fabricated documents and to file
final report. As a consequence, CBI had conducted investigation, filed
three final reports wherein, the first petitioner and the 2nd petitioner are
arrayed as accused. These three final reports were taken up for trial in
C.C. Nos.24 of 2010, 25 of 2010 and 26 of 2010. It is suffice to states
that in all the three cases, the petitioners were found guilty and
convicted.
5. The modus operandi in all these cases are one and the same. 15
days old infant born to Saidabanu @ Jabin (mother) was named as
'Sundari' and handed over to MSS organization/the second petitioner.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
The first petitioner created forged surrender deed for the child and then
the child was given adoption to one Mr.Martin Willet Bridgestock and
Mrs.Vicki Le Anne Bridgestock, a citizen of Australia, taking
Rs.2,57,024/- as donation. It is a subject matter of C.C. No.24 of 2010.
6. On 18.02.1999, a male child by name Subash, aged about one
year nine months playing in front of his house was kidnapped and
brought in the house of one Varadarajan, who turned as approver. A
surrender certificate was prepared in the name of Noorjahan and the first
petitioner Somasundaram @ Somu has signed in the surrender deed as
Noorjahan. He prepared fake documents and got necessary orders from
the Court by assigning a new name to the child as 'Asraf' and given in
adoption to Mr.Mathew Manthe and Ruthe Manthe of Manitowoc, USA.
This is a subject matter of CC No. 25 of 2010.
7. Likewise another child by name Sathishkumar born to Kathirvel
and Nagarani was kidnapped in the night of 8th March 1999, with a help
of approver Varadharajan, fake records were created by this petitioner
and given in adoption to a foreigner. This is subject matter of C.C. No.26
of 2010.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
8.The petitioner was party to the scheme of conspiracy to do the
illegal act of kidnapping the children and giving them in adoption by
changing their identity of birth and name including parentage. The
second petitioner organization was able to illegally give in adoption of
Indian children to foreigners circumventing the illegal process. The trial
Court held these petitioners and sentences them to undergo sentence of 6
months Simple Imprisonment for offences under Sections 120B, 419, 468
r/w 471 IPC and 1 year Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section
468 r/w 471 IPC with Rs.1000/- fine in default 3 weeks Simple
Imprisonment each for all the three cases and A10/2nd appellant to pay a
fine of Rs.10,000/- each for all the three cases.
9. Being aggrieved by the conviction of the trial Court, appeal
been filed before the Sessions Judge and the Session Judge after giving
thorough scrutiny of the documents has found no merits in the appeal and
confirmed the judgement of the trial Court in Crl.A. Nos.131,132 & 111
of 2019 dated 25.04.2023.
10. The Revision is filed against the concurrent finding of the trial
Court, on the ground that the prosecution is launched on an erroneous
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
premises, while the alleged crime being done purportedly by the persons
engaged by the Chairman of MSS organization but he was not prosecuted
and the overt act basically against the other accused and the approver, the
first petitioner Somu who is arrayed as A8 in CC No.24 and 25 and A2 in
C.C. No.26 of 2010 was only a paid employee under the organization and
he is not aware of the alleged fabrication of documents or kidnapping.
11. The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State
submits that the first petitioner herein been revealed to the kidnapping till
adoption to foreigners. He had forged the surrender certificates as if the
biological parents had surrendered the child to the MSS organization and
agreed to give the child for adoption. He has taken photographs of
children with fake parents and he has taken children to the Doctor to get
health certificate. The affidavits and surrender certificates prepared in
the non-judicial stamp papers are purchased from the stamp vendor
identified as the person who purchased the stamp papers to create fake
documents. For the gravity of the offence, the Courts below had imposed
Rigorous Imprisonment for only one year and also ordered to run
concurrently and therefore there is no perversity or error apparent in the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
order of the Courts below. By way of the Revision, neither the conviction
nor the sentence need be interfered in the light of the gravity of the
offence.
12. This Court after going through the records finds that non
prosecution of the other accused who are equally contributed to the crime
need not be a reason to interfere the conviction of this petitioner who had
actively participated in the crime. The records and evidence placed
before this Court indicates that due to the intervention of the Division
Bench order, the crime which has been prevailing unabatedly had come
to the notice of the law enforcing agency and after sustained
investigation by the CBI, illegal transportation of children across the
border despite stringent guidelines and Rules been going on unabatedly.
13. These three cases which have been tried pursuant to the
direction of this Court and the final report filed by CBI is only a tip of
the iceberg wherein, mafia involved in child trafficking had abused the
legal process by creating fake documents for getting Court orders and
made it apparently a genuine adoption.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
14. In this case, prosecution has proved beyond doubt that these
three children were given in adoption by the 2nd petitioner's organization
were not born to the persons who surrendered the children to this
organization. The surrender certificate itself is a forged document which
has been created by the first petitioner herein and handwriting expert has
identified his specimen signature with the signature found in the
surrender certificates and having actively participated in the crime of
child trafficking. This Court finds no reason to interfere the concurrent
findings of the Courts below for any reason, hence these Revisions
Petitions are dismissed.
08.08.2023 Internet : Yes/No Index: Yes/No
rkp
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
To
1. The IV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai.
2.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
3. The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Anti-Corruption Branch, Chennai.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.RC. Nos.1288, 1383 & 1278 of 2023
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
rkp
Crl.RC. Nos.1278, 1288 & 1383 of 2023
08.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!