Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9796 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
Rameshkumar ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
The General Manager,
V.L.C.Company,
Kuzhithurai,
Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the
order made in W.P(MD)No.643 of 2015, dated 31.01.2022.
For Appellant :Mr.D.Christenson Jugunu
For Respondent :Mr.K.N.Thambi
***
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)
Heard Mr.D.Christenson Jugunu, learned counsel for the
appellant and Mr.K.N.Thambi, learned counsel for the respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
2. This Writ Appeal is directed as against the order made in
W.P(MD)No.643 of 2015, dated 31.01.2022.
3. The appellant, who was employed in the respondent Company
has filed the writ petition in W.P(MD)No.643 of 2015, challenging the order
passed by the Labour Court, Tirunelveli in I.D.No.29 of 2012, dated
12.03.2013 and to direct the respondent Company to reinstate him and pay
arrears of wages from 01.06.2004 to 19.12.2010.
4. When the writ was taken up for hearing, before the learned
Single Judge, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted
that the respondent Company is a defunct company and it has been wound
up and a sum of Rs.20,472/- was alone available and payable to the writ
petitioner at the time of winding up and the same will be paid to him.
5. Based on the said statement, the learned Single Judge, has
disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent to pay the amount
within two weeks. Challenging the same, the appellant/writ petitioner has
filed this writ appeal.
6. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent now
states that the respondent is only a private entrepreneur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
7. Therefore, in view of the fact admitted before this Court that the
respondent is neither a Company nor there was any winding up, this Court
finds that the order of the learned Single Judge is erroneous and the same
cannot be sustained. As a result, this writ appeal is allowed and the order
of the learned Single Judge, dated 31.01.2022 made in
W.P(MD)No.643 of 2015, is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the
learned Single Judge, to decide the same on merits and in accordance with
law. It is open to the respondent to raise all the objections before the
learned Single Judge. No Costs.
[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]
07.08.2023
Index : Yes / No
NCC : Yes/No
pm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
S.S.SUNDAR, J.
and
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
pm
W.A(MD)No.1271 of 2023
07.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!