Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9788 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
CMA No.1054 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1758 of 2023
and CMP No.17237 of 2023
M.L.Arivazhagan ... Appellant/Respondent
-vs-
1. P.Valarmathi
2. A. Srividhya (minor)
Rep. by her mother and
natural guardian P.Valarmathi ... Respondents/ Petitioners
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts
Act, prayed to set aside the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by the learned
III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in
H.M.O.P.No.3135 of 2022.
For Appellant : Mr.B.Balaji
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
CMA No.1054 of 2023
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court delivered by V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.] This is an Appeal by the husband against the order of the interim
maintenance granted by the III Additional Principal Family Court at
Chennai, in IA No.1 of 2023 in HMOP No.3135 of 2022 .
2. The respondent wife had filed the petition under Section 24 of
the Hindu Marriage Act, claiming Rs.15,000/- per month for herself and
Rs.10,000/- per month for the minor girl child and Rs.50,000/- towards
the litigation expenses. The husband is working as Master Chef and he is
also claiming to do freelancer work.
3. The affidavit of assets filed as per the direction of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court states that the husband is earning about Rs.1000/- per
day, but the learned counsel for the appellant would allege that he is
working only for 15 days, the other 15 days he is not working. The
learned Family Court went through the affidavit of the husband and came
to the conclusion as follows:
(i) He has failed to maintain the wife and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA No.1054 of 2023
daughter;
(ii) On account of the failure he is liable to pay
maintenance;
(iii) It had granted Rs.10,000/- as maintenance
towards the wife and Rs.5,000/- towards the maintenance of
the child; and
(iv) It has also directed payment of Rs.50,000/-
towards litigation expenses to the wife.
assailing this order, the husband is on Appeal before us.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the
appellant had undergone Hernia operation and therefore, he is not in a
position to pay the maintenance. Hernia operation is a one time
operation and is not a recurring expense. Apart from that sickness of the
husband cannot be a ground to deny maintenance towards the wife and
minor child, who in the present case happens to be a girl child. The
husband has not produced a income certificate before the Court to
substantiate that he is earning only Rs.15,000/- per month. The Family
Court has also taken into consideration that the wife is staying in her own
accommodation. It has also recorded the fact that the husband is doing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA No.1054 of 2023
catering business apart from being a Chef.
5. Being the discretionary order and the amount not being
unreasonable, we are not inclined to interfere with the Appeal. The
Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J .) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.) 07.08.2023 jv Index : No Internet : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: No
To
1. The III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai.
2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court, Chennai 104.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA No.1054 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.
jv
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1758 of 2023 and CMP No.17237 of 2023
07.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!