Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Jagannath vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 9730 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9730 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023

Madras High Court
K.Jagannath vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 7 August, 2023
                                                                               W.P.No.21230 of 2023


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 07.08.2023

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                             W.P.No.21230 of 2023 and
                                          W.M.P.Nos.20646 & 20647 of 2023

                     1.K.Jagannath,
                       Electrician (B License Holder).
                     2.R.Manikandan,
                       Electrician.
                     3.R.Saravanan,
                       Plumber.
                     4.R.Munivaradhan,
                       Xerox Operator.
                     5.D.Kumar,
                       Office Assistant.
                     6.C.Hanish,
                       Lift Operator.
                     7.K.Vishnu,
                       Life Operator.
                     8.S.Raman,
                       Floor Attender,
                       All are Working,
                       Anna Centenary Library,
                       Kotturpuram, Chennai- 600 085.                   ... Petitioners
                                                         Versus
                     1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                       Represented by its Chief Secretary,
                       Secretariat, Fort St.George,
                       Chennai-600 009.

                     2.The Secretary,
                       Government of Tamil Nadu,

                     Page No.1 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      W.P.No.21230 of 2023


                        Department of School Education,
                        Secretariat, Fort St.George,
                        Chennai-600 009.

                     3.The Chief Librarian and Information Officer,
                       Anna Centenary Library,
                       Kotturpuram, Chennai-600085.

                     4.The Director of Public Library,
                       No.737/1, Anna Salai,
                       Chennai-600 002.                                       ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records related to
                     G.O.(Ms)No.178 (School Education (Ms) Department) dated 14.10.2022,
                     issued by the 1st respondent and the Reply Letter dated 01.11.2021
                     (Na.Ka.No.60/A.Nu.Nu2021), issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the
                     same as illegal and directing the respondents to regularize the services of
                     the Petitioners in Anna Centenary Library, Kottupuram, Chennai as per
                     G.O(Ms)No.131, dated 28.11.2020, with all attendant and consequential
                     benefits of regularization.

                                  For Petitioners   :       Mr.Ramesh Ganapathy

                                  For Respondents :         Mr.Silambannan,
                                                            Additional Advocate General for
                                                            Mr.P.Baladhandayutham,
                                                            Special Government Pleader

                                                           ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records related to

G.O.(Ms)No.178 School Education (Public Library-2) Department, dated

14.10.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and the reply letter, dated

01.11.2021 in Na.Ka.No.60/A.Nu.Nu 2021 issued by the 3rd respondent and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to regularize the service

of the petitioners in Anna Centenary Library, Kottupuram, Chennai as per

G.O.(Ms).No.131 Personnel and Administrative Reforms (F) Department,

dated 28.11.2020 with all attendant and consequential benefits of

regularization.

2.The grievance of the Writ Petitioner is that the issuance of

G.O.(Ms)No.178 School Education (Public Library-2) Department, dated

14.10.2022 deals with outsourcing of employment in Anna Centenary

Library, Chenna and in newly opened Kalaignar Centenary Library,

Madurai and also deals with redeployment of employees from Anna

Centenary Library, Chennai to Kalaignar Centenary Library, Madurai. The

petitioners have been working from the year 2010 as Electrician, Plumber,

Xerox Operator, Office Assistant, Life Operator and Floor Attendar in Anna

Centenary Library, Chennai on temporary basis. Now, the above said

Government Order has been passed only in order to displace the petitioners.

Therefore, the same has been put in challenge in this Writ Petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

3.When the Government took the policy decision vide

G.O.(Ms)No.178 School Education (Public Library-2) Department, dated

14.10.2022, merely because the petitioners have been working as temporary

basis from the year 2010, such Government Order cannot be quashed.

4.On perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioners have

already filed writ petition in W.P.No.11702 of 2017 for regularization of

service, however, the same has been dismissed by this Court on 20.07.2017,

which has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in

W.A.No.1348 of 2017, vide judgment, dated 03.11.2017 holding that the

claim of regularization by the temporary employees is not permissible in

law and it is for the appellants/writ petitioners to compete in the selection

process, however, the respondent may give some weightage by awarding

some marks, while they compete in the selection process, keeping in view

the services rendered by the appellants/writ petitioners, which would be in

proportion to the number of years of services rendered by them. Now, it is

the contention of the petitioners that despite such direction of this Court on

03.11.2017, no recruitment process has been commenced, therefore, the

only apprehension of the petitioners is, they may be displaced by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

outsourcing.

5.The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the

respondents submitted that even the outsource is done, the petitioner shall

be absorbed by giving priority in outsourcing on certain conditions.

According to them, they will be absorbed in the following categories:

As per the name of the job the employees required are made equivalence with the employees mentioned in the classes of employees in Notification under minimum wages act 1948 (Central Act XI of 1948) for employment in shops and Commercial Establishments.

(See G.O 2(D) No.14 Labour and Employment (J1) Department dated 05.03.2019) Designation Basic Dearness PF Employer ESI Bonus Basic Pay Allowance Contribution (Employer (@ Wage Rate (In (In Rs.) (@12%) (In Contribution) 8.33%) per person Rs.) Rs.) (@3.25%) (In (In Rs.) per month Rs.) (CTC) (In Rs.) Officer 5457 5087 1265 343 878 13030 Assistant Multi-

                      Tasking
                      Staff (Lift 5396            5087        1258         341        873       12955
                      Operator /
                      Attender)
                      Plumber            5507     5087        1271         344        882       13091
                      Electrician        5507     5087        1271         344        882       13091
                      Xerox              5396     5087        1258         341        873       12955
                      Operator

The above said statement is recorded.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

6.In such view of the matter, as and when outsourcing is

commenced, the respondents shall give priority to the petitioners and absorb

the scale as narrated above. Since the petitioners' right for regularization

has already been rejected by this Court, as a matter of right, they cannot

seek regularization once again. Besides they have also no right to challenge

the policy of the Government.

7.Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

07.08.2023

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

vv2

To

1.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

2.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

3.The Chief Librarian and Information Officer, Anna Centenary Library, Kotturpuram, Chennai-600085.

4.The Director of Public Library, No.737/1, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21230 of 2023

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vv2

W.P.No.21230 of 2023

07.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter