Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11652 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2023
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 31.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
Manikandan ...Appellant
vs.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Thiruvannamalai District
Thiruvannamalai
2. The State rep. by,
Inspector of Police
Thiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station
Thiruvannamalai
Crime No.195 of 2019
3. Mallika ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14(A) (2) SC/ST
Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
praying to set aside the order made in Crl.M.P. No.1426 of 2023 in S.C.
No.188 of 2019 before the Special Court for the Exclusive Trail of
POCSO Act Cases, Thiruvannamalai and to enlarge the appellant on bail.
For Appellant : Mr. C. Ramaraj
For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Vinothraja
Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R3 : No appearance.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
JUDGMENT
Challenging the orders passed by the Sessions Judge, Special
Court for the Exclusive Trail of POCSO Act Cases, Tiruvannamalai, in
Crl.M.P. No.1426/2023 in Spl. S.C. No.188/2019, the present appeal is
filed.
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in Spl.S.C. No.188/2019
for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 376 IPC r/w 4 and 8 of
POCSO Act and Section 3(1)(W)(i), 3(2)(va) OF SC/ST Act. He filed a
petition before the Sessions Judge, Special Court for the Exclusive Trail
of POCSO Act Cases, Thiruvannamalai, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in
Crl.M.P.No.1426/2023 seeking bail and the same was dismissed on
12.07.2023. Aggrieved over the same, the present Criminal Appeal is
filed.
3. A perusal of the records shows that the accused was not
regularly appearing before the trial court, on account of which, non
bailable warrants were issued against the accused on 23.09.2019 and
17.08.2021. On all these occasions, the appellant recalled the warrant
by filing a petition under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. Thereafter, when the case
was posted for framing of charges on 03.09.2022, the appellant/accused
did not appear before the trial court and once again a non bailable https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
warrant was issued against him on the same day. The accused was
arrested by the police on 16.06.2023 and now the case is posted for
examination of witnesses.
4. Since the accused jumped bail, dismissal of the bail application
by the trial court is perfectly in order and therefore I do not see any
reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is
dismissed.
5. In the result,
i. The Criminal Appeal is dismissed.
ii. The order made in Crl.M.P. No.1426 of 2023 in S.C. No.188 of
2019 by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for the
Exclusive Trail of POCSO Act Cases, Thiruvannamalai, is
confirmed.
31.08.2023
bga Index : yes/no Speaking /Non speaking Order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
To
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai
2. The State rep. by, Inspector of Police Thiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station Thiruvannamalai Crime No.195 of 2019
3. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for the Exclusive Trail of POCSO Act Cases, Thiruvannamalai.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
bga
Crl.A.No.786 of 2023
31.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!