Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mx Media & Entertainment Pte. Ltd vs K.Punniyamoorthy
2023 Latest Caselaw 10806 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10806 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Mx Media & Entertainment Pte. Ltd vs K.Punniyamoorthy on 21 August, 2023
                                                                     OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED:   21.08.2023

                                                    CORAM


                             THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                       AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU


                                            OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023
                                                      and
                                            C.M.P.No.17268 of 2023

                     MX Media & Entertainment Pte. Ltd.
                     Wrongly arrayed as “MX Players”
                     Having its office at 71 Robinson Road
                     No.14-01, Singapore (068895)
                     Republic of Singapore.                              ..      Appellant

                                                       Vs.

                     1.K.Punniyamoorthy

                     2.Ondraga Entertainment
                       Represented by Mr.Gautham Vasudev Menon
                       Having its office at:61/3, Gandhi Street
                       Kanagam, Taramani
                       Chennai-600113.

                     3.S.Venkataramanan
                     4.A.Reshma Ghatala                                       .. Respondents




                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023


                     Prayer: Appeal filed under Order 13(1) of the O.S.Rules read with
                     Clause 15 of the amended Letters Patent 1865 and read with Section
                     13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial
                     Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Act, 2018 against the
                     order dated 28.04.2023 made in O.A. No.284 of 2023.


                                      For the Appellant         : Mr.Balasubramanian
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  For Mr.A.K.Raghevulu

                                      For the Respondents       : Mr.M.S.Krishnan
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  For Mr.K.Moorthy (R1)

                                                                  Mr.A.Abdul Hameed
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  For Mrs.Revathi Manivannan
                                                                  (RR2 to 4)

                                                        JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.Balasubramanian, learned Senior Counsel

for Mr.A.K.Raghevulu, learned counsel for the appellant;

Mr.M.S.Krishnan, learned senior counsel for Mr.K.Moorthy, learned

counsel for the first respondent; and Mr.A.Abdul Hameed, learned

Senior Counsel for Mrs.Revathi Manivannan, learned counsel for the

second to fourth respondents.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023

2. The petition under section 9 has been decided finally by the

learned Single Judge.

3. The primordial contention of the appellant is that the

learned Single Judge has not discussed on the merits of the

contention and the whole discussion was about the maintainability

of an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996. After coming to the conclusion that the application under

Section 9 of the Act is maintainable, the learned Single Judge

straightaway made the interim stay absolute.

4. According to the appellant, the web-series is not yet

completed. The learned Senior Advocate for the appellant submits

that the appellant undertakes that the appellant wold not release

the web-series until further orders of the Court, if the matter is

remitted to the learned Single Judge.

5. We have heard learned Senior Advocate for respondent no.1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023

/original applicant.

6. It appears that while passing the impugned order, the

learned Single Judge only debated upon the maintainability of the

petition under Section 9 and after arriving at the conclusion that the

petition under Section 9 is maintainable, straightaway made the

interim stay absolute. No reasons appear to have been recorded

while making interim stay absolute.

7. The reasons are now considered to be the third pillar of the

principles of natural justice. The interim order is bereft of reasons as

to why the interim stay is made absolute.

8. As the impugned order is sans reasons, the order to the

extent of making the interim stay absolute is set aside. However, we

record the undertaking of the learned Senior Advocate for the

appellant that the appellant would not release the web-series

''Queen-2'' until further orders from the learned Single Judge.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023

9. The parties shall appear before the learned Single Judge on

08.09.2023. The learned Single Judge shall thereafter take up the

matter as per his convenience.

10. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be

no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.17268 of 2023 is

closed.

                                                             (S.V.G., CJ.)              (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                                       21.08.2023
                     Index            : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes/No

                     Maya



                     To:

                     The Sub Assistant Registrar
                     Commercial Cases
                     High Court, Madras.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(Maya)

OSA(CAD) No.94 of 2023

21.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter