Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10751 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2023
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.08.2023
CORAM:
The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
P.S.G.Power Solutions Private Limited
By its Managing Director A.Sargunan
No.7, A-Block, Iswariyam Aveneue
Rani Street, Somu Street,
Medawalkkam, Chennai – 600 100. ...Petitioner/Appellant
-Vs-
A.Saraswathy ...Respondent/Respondent
Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973, to call for the records in C.C.No.233 of 2013 on the
file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial
Level) Alandur, and set aside the judgment dated 11.12.2014 and punish
the Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and
direct the Accused to pay compensation of cheque amount.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.P.Thinesh
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
JUDGMENT
When the case came up for hearing on 12.07.2023, learned Counsel
for the Respondent alone was present in Court. There was no
representation on behalf of the Appellant. Therefore, Registry was directed
to post this case under the caption “For Dismissal” on 19.07.2023.
2. On 19.07.2023, learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that
he had returned the case records to the party/Appellant. Therefore, this
Court directed the Registry to remove the name of the Counsel on record
for the Appellant. Also, the Registry was directed to issue notice to the
Appellant, directing the Appellant to appear before this Court either
through Counsel or directly, failing which the Appeal will be dismissed.
Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to post the Appeal under the
caption “For Dismissal”on 18.08.2023.
3. Today, 18.08.2023, when the case came up for hearing, the
learned Counsel for the Respondent alone is present in Court. The Registry
has placed the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
(Magisterial Level), Alandur. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track
Court (Magisterial Level), Alandur, had stated that notice was sent through https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
the Inspector of Police, T-14 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai. The
Inspector of Police, T-14 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai, had filed a
report in D.No.1205 of 2023 dated 02.08.2023, stating that the Appellant
had vacated the premises and therefore, the Appellant was unable to serve
notice. In the light of the letter placed by the Registry from the learned
Judicial Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Alandur, along with the
report of the Inspector of Police, T-14 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai.
No purpose will be served by repeatedly adjourning this case. Hence, this
Court is inclined to dismiss the Appeal.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed.
18.08.2023 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level) Alandur.
2.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.,
cda
Crl.A.No.256 of 2015
18.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!