Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Kumar .T.V vs The District Collector
2023 Latest Caselaw 10366 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10366 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Anil Kumar .T.V vs The District Collector on 14 August, 2023
                                                                 W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 14.08.2023

                                                  CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                       W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022 and
                                  WMP(MD) Nos.16488, 16489 & 14704 of 2022

                     Anil Kumar .T.V                                 ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs

                     1.The District Collector,
                       District Collectorate,
                       Nagercoil,
                       Kanyakumari District.

                     2.The District Revenue Officer,
                       District Collectorate,
                       Nagercoil,
                       Kanyakumari District.

                     3.The Executive Officer,
                       Kollemcode Town Panchayat,
                       Kollemcode Post,
                       Kanyakumari District-629160.

                     4.The Tahsildar,
                       Tholayavattam,
                       Kanyakumari District-629171.




                     1/19
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022


                     5.The Village Administrative Officer,
                       Kollemcode (A) Village,
                       Kollemcode Post,
                       Kanyakumari District-629160.

                     6.The District Environmental Engineer,
                       Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board,
                       No.318/46a, Water Tank Road,
                       Nagercoil,
                       Kanyakumari District-629001.

                     7.The Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager,
                       Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
                       Madurai Divisional Office,
                       No.2, Race Course Road,
                       Chokkikulam,
                       Madurai-625002.

                     8.Subashini                                        ...Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Declaration that the No
                     Objection certificate, issued by the Respondent Nos. 1-6 for the
                     purpose of setting up of Indian Oil Corporation Petroleum Retail
                     Outlet in R.Sy.No.418/6A2, Kollemcode Village in favour of the
                     eighth respondent and the subsequent license granted by the seventh
                     respondent for petroleum retail pump outlet as illegal and
                     consequentially forbear the eighth respondent from constructing
                     Petrol Retail Pump Outlet in the subject matter land.



                     2/19
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022


                                  For Petitioner     :Ms.J.R.Annie Abinaya
                                  For R1, R2, R4 & R5:Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh
                                                       Additional Government Pleader
                                  For R6              :Mrs.Vijayakumari Natarajan
                                                       Standing Counsel
                                  For R7              :Mr.K.Muraleedharan
                                  For R8              :Mr.C.K.M.Appaji

                                                    ORDER

The petitioner, a resident of Kollamkodu Village has

filed this writ petition for a declaration that 'No Objection

Certificate', if any issued by the respondents 1 to 6 in favour of the

eighth respondent for setting up a Petroleum Retail Outlet in Survey

No.418/6A2, Kollankodu Village is illegal and also sought for a

consequential direction to the official respondents to forbear the

eighth respondent from constructing any Petroleum Retail Outlet in

the subject land.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the eighth respondent

has attempted to construct a Petroleum Retail Outlet within a radius

of 11 metres from the petitioner's house. Alleging that he has

submitted an application before the competent authority. Based on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

the application of the eighth respondent, the District Revenue

Officer has issued a notice to the petitioner and other residents of

that area on 07.11.2020, calling upon them to offer their objections,

if any, under the Petroleum Rules, 2002. Accordingly, an enquiry

was conducted on 08.11.2020. The petitioner and other residents

have raised their objections. Thereafter, the respondents have not

intimated about the action taken on their objections. The petitioner

has repeatedly reminded the District Revenue Officer under the RTI

Act, wherein, it was stated that a decision has not been taken on the

application of the eighth respondent for opening the petrol retail

outlet in the above survey Number. As per the information provided

in the application submitted under the RTI Act, No Objection

Certificate was not issued to the eighth respondent. However, in the

month of February 2022, the eighth respondent commenced the

construction of the petrol outlet in the above said survey number.

Therefore, the petitioner has immediately approached this Court for

the reliefs as stated supra.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by

referring the notification issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and

Natural Gas, dated 10.08.2018 and the guidelines issued by the

Petroleum Corporation for setting up of a new petrol outlets submits

that there shall not be any petroleum outlet, if there is any High

Tension lines are passing through the site and no petroleum outlet

shall be established within a radius of 30 metres from the residential

area. In this case, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner,

the petitioner's house situated within 11 metres from the proposed

petrol Pump and there are other houses also in existence within 30

metres radius. Without considering these significant guidelines, No

Objection Certificate was issued by the District Revenue Officer and

the Petroleum Corporation has also proceeded with granting further

permission to establish the petrol Pump. The learned counsel has

also relied upon the orders of the Honourable Division Bench of this

Court in WP(MD) No.19244 and 19830 of 2019 and 5690 of 2019,

dated 30.09.2019 & 05.08.2019 respectively.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

4.The learned counsel appearing for the seventh

respondent submits that the claim of the petitioner is baseless and

meaningless. The seventh respondent Corporation has acted upon

based on the Certificate issued by the Competent authorities and

Indian Oil Corporation has also selected the location after taking

into consideration of all safety measures in the interest of the public.

He further submits that the competent authorities have issued No

Objection Certificate under the Petroleum Act, by taking into

consideration of the objections given by the petitioner and other

residents in that locality that there is no violation or deviation for

commissioning the Petroleum Retail Outlet. Moreover, number of

vehicles plying in that locality and the requirement for those

vehicles' operation has also been taken into consideration before

issuing the No Objection Certificate. He further submits that the

guidelines issued are not of statutory in force and it is only

recommendatory in nature. On this ground alone, the licence which

has already been granted in favour of the eighth respondent cannot

be interfered with.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

5.The learned counsel appearing for the eighth

respondent is relying upon a detailed counter affidavit filed by him

and submits that

i. The subject property is situated in the isolated location of

Kollemcode Town, abutting Thirumannam-Kirathur Road. On

26.05.2020, the eighth respondent has preferred an application

before the seventh respondent for the grant of licence to run an

IOCL Petroleum Outlet in her property.

ii. The application of the eighth respondent was forwarded to the

District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District, the third

respondent herein for the grant of No Objection Certificate.

Consequently, the third respondent has made a field visit,

calling for objections, if any from the local men, by sending

notice, conducted public hearing on 18.11.2020. After

scrutinizing the written objections and after assessing ground

reality, No Objection Certificate was issued to the eighth

respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

iii. The third respondent while issuing No Objection Certificate

took into consideration of the following particulars:-

a) Possession of the site by the applicant is lawful and

authorization from land owner or lease holder ofr

developing premises under these Rules for storage of

Petroleum products:

b) Interest of public, specially the facilities like Schools,

Hospitals or Proximity to places of public assembly and

the mitigating measures, if any is provided:

c) Traffic density and impact on traffic;

d) Conformity of proposed to the local or area development

planning:

e) Accessibility of the site to the tenders in case of

emergency and preparedness of fire services for

combating the emergencies:

f) Genuineness of purpose

g) Any other matter pertinent to public safety:

h) To construct Blast Wall compound in the premises since

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

habitations are there from 100 meters as specified by

Fire & Rescue Department;

i) To install 2 Trally type from fire Extinguisher

j) To install lighting arrester in the premises.

Therefore, Rule 144 of Petroleum Rules, 2002 was

strictly adhered to.

iv. The house of the petitioner is located 40 meters away from the

proposed Petroleum Pump and other houses are located for

away from the proposed Petroleum Pump.

v. Under Clause 'H' of the Office Memorandum of the Central

Pollution Control Board, Delhi in B-13011/1/2019-20/AQM,

dated 07.01.2020, the siting criteria of retail outlet are detailed

below “In case of siting criteria for Petrol Pump new Retail

outlets shall not be located within a radial distance of 50

meters (from fill point/dispensing units/vent pipe whichever is

nearest) from schools, hospitals (10 beds and above) and

residential areas designated as per local laws. In case of

constraints in providing 50 meters distance, the retail outlet

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

shall implement additional safety measures as prescribed by

PESO. In no case the distance between new retail outlet from

schools, Hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential area

designated as per local laws shall be less than 30 meters. No

high tension line shall pass over the retail outlet”. The

prohibited radial distance of 50 meters for establishing a new

retail outlet is applicable only to the residential area

designated as per local law. The eighth respondent's property

comprised in Survey No.418/6A2(Part), Kollemcode-A

Village is not classified as a residential area and thus there is

no impediment for opening the Petrol Bunk in the subject

property. The petitioner with an oblique motive to gain

advantage, misinterpreted the official memorandum of the

Central Pollution Control Board dated 07.01.2020 that the

retailed outlets shall not be located within 50 meters from

residential areas, has filed this writ petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

6.The Executive Officer, Kollemcode Town Panchayat/

the third respondent herein has also filed a counter affidavit stating

that based on No Objection Certificate issued by the District

Revenue Officer and other authorities, the third respondent has

approved the building plan submitted by the eighth respondent.

7.This Court considered the rival submissions made by

the counsel on all sides and perused the materials placed on record.

8.The petitioner is a resident of Kollemcode Village and

he has constructed a house after obtaining necessary permission

from the local Planning authority. The eighth respondent was

intended to put up a Petroleum Retail outlet in S.No.418/6A2 of

Kollemcode Village, which according to the petitioner is within 11

metre radius from his residential house. Rule 144 of Petroleum

Rules, 2002 prescribed certain certificates, which needs to be

obtained from the District Revenue Officer and a standard proforma

is also issued to that effect. The District Authority, who has to issue

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

No Objection Certificate as required under Rule 144 of Petroleum

Rules has to consider the following aspects before issuing the

Certificate.

a) Possession of the site by the applicant is lawful and authorisation from land owner or lease holder for developing premises under these rules for storage of petroleum products;

b) interest of public, specially the facilities like schools, hospitals or proximity to places of public assembly and the mitigating measures,if any, is provided;

c) traffic density and impact on traffic;

d) conformity of proposal to the local or area development planning;

e) accessibility of the site to fire tenders in case of emergency and preparedness fire services for combating the emergencies;

f) genuineness of purpose.

g) Any other matter pertinent to public safety

The Central Pollution Control Board has also issued guidelines for

setting up a new Petroleum outlet by its memorandum dated

07.10.2020 and Clause H would be relevant and the same is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

extracted as under:-

H. Siting criteria of Retail Outlets:-

In case of siting criteria for petrol pumps new Retails Outlets

shall not be located within a radial distance of 50 meters (from

fill point/dispensing units) vent pipe whichever is nearest) from

Schools, Hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential areas

designated as per local laws. In case of constraints in providing

50 meters distance, the retail outlet shall implement additional

safety measures as prescribed by PESO in no case the distance

between new retails outlet from schools, Hospitals (10 beds and

above) and residential area designated as per local laws shall be

less than 30 meters. No high tension line shall pass over the

retails outlet.

9.These guidelines were issued as a supplementary to the

existing guidelines and orders. The Division Bench of this Court in

WP(MD)No.5690 of 2019, dated 05.08.2009 in a similar issue has

held that the District Authority while issuing NOC has not made any

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

observations or findings as to how he has ascertained the

requirements of the proforma were satisfied. Ultimately, NOC in that

case was set aside and the matter was remitted back for fresh

consideration by the District Authority.

10.In the other Judgment of the Division Bench of this

Court in similar issue, this Court has held that No Objection

Certificate issued for setting up the petroleum outlet is nothing but

the verbatim replica of the proforma and nothing on record to show

as to how the factors mentioned therein have been satisfactorily

complied with to the satisfaction of the concerned authority. The

Division Bench has also held that there cannot be any mechanical

grant of NOC/approval/consents and each authorities have to

discharge the duties cast upon them under the statute.

11.The petitioner claims that he is a resident within 11

metres from the proposed Petroleum Retail outlet. The eighth

respondent claims that the petitioner's house is situated 40 metres

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

away from the petroleum outlet. As per the guidelines issued by the

Pollution Control Board, an establishment of a new Petroleum

Retails Outlet shall not be located within a radial distance of 50

meters from Schools, Hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential

areas designated as per local laws. In case of any constrains, the

retail outlet shall be established with an additional safety measures

as prescribed by Explosiveness Safety Order. That apart, there shall

not be any outlet within the radius of 30 meters from the residential

area designated as per local law. If there is any High Tension lines

passing through the outlet, there cannot be any permission for

setting up the outlet. These guidelines were also issued as a

supplementary to the existing relevant rules, guidelines and orders.

The authority, while issuing No Objection Certificate ought to have

considered these guidelines before issuing No Objection Certificate.

12.In this case, in view of the contradictory stand taken

by the petitioner and the eighth respondent with regard to the

distance of the petrol outlet from the residential area, this Court, by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

order dated 31.10.2022 directed the Revenue Inspector to personally

visit the place and survey the land and to file a report before this

Court. As per the report filed, it appears that the petitioner's house is

situated within 11 meters from the proposed Petroleum retail outlet.

The petitioner's house also appears to be constructed with the

approval from the local Planning authority.

13.In view of the foregoing discussions, this writ

petition is allowed. No Objection Certificate issued by the District

Revenue Officer, dated 08.02.2022 is hereby set aside and the matter

is remitted back for fresh consideration by the District Revenue

Officer, Kanyakumari. No costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

14.08.2023

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Executive Officer, Kollemcode Town Panchayat, Kollemcode Post, Kanyakumari District-629160.

4.The Tahsildar, Tholayavattam,Kanyakumari District-629171.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Kollemcode (A) Village, Kollemcode Post, Kanyakumari District-629160.

6.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, No.318/46a, Water Tank Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District-629001.

7.The Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Madurai Divisional Office, No.2, Race Course Road, Chokkikulam,Madurai-625002.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn

Order made in W.P(MD)No.20228 of 2022 and WMP(MD) Nos.16488, 16489 & 14704 of 2022

14.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter