Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10174 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023
Crl.O.P.No.8758 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.8758 of 2019
and
Crl.M.P.No.4639 of 2019
K.A.Manoharan
...Petitioners
vs.
1.The State rep by its
Inspector of Police,
CCIW Dharmapuri
(Crime No.9 of 2003)
2.N.Shanmugam,
Deputy Registrar (Housing Board),
Vellore Division, Vellore.
...Respondents
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.229 of 2016 on
the file of the learned Fast Track Court/Magisterial Level, Hosur, Krishnagiri
District and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.Mukund R.Pandiyan
For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1
No appearance for R2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No.1/4
Crl.O.P.No.8758 of 2019
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the
proceedings initiated by the respondent against the petitioner in C.C.No.229 of
2016 on the file of the learned Fast Track Court/Magisterial Level, Hosur,
Krishnagiri District.
2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all factual in
nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide the
same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure
Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court
below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance
with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings pending
before the Court below.
3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a
direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC No.229 of 2016
within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
The trial shall be conducted on a day to day basis in accordance with the
guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State
of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2/4 Crl.O.P.No.8758 of 2019
tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of the
petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH
SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is also closed.
10.08.2023
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order nsa
To
1.The Inspector of Police, CCIW Dharmapuri (Crime No.9 of 2003)
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3/4 Crl.O.P.No.8758 of 2019
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
nsa
Crl.O.P.No.8758 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.4639 of 2019
10.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4/4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!