Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4989 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
Crl. A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE : 28.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Crl. A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
Prabhu @ Prabakaran ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Periyakulam Sub Division,
Theni District.
(Devathanapatti PS.
Crime No.391 of 2016) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Muthupandi ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto
Complainant
Prayer : This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14(A)(2) of Scheduled
Caste / Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, to
set aside the order of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases
under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni in Crl.M.P.No.250 of 2023 dated 20.02.2023
and enlarge the appellant on bail in Crime No.391 of 2016 on the file of the
first respondent.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Muthukumar
For R1 : Mr.A.Albert James
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For R2 : M/s.S.Prabha
Legal Aid Counsel
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal is directed against the order passed in
Crl.M.P.No.250 of 2023 in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2020 dated 20.02.2023 by the
learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA)
Act, Theni.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.07.2016, there was a
wordy quarrel between the appellant and the second respondent/defacto
complainant regarding pick up the passenger in the auto, due to which, the
appellant had attacked the second respondent by using iron lever and on that
basis, FIR came to be registered against the appellant herein in Crime No.391
of 2016 for the offences under Sections 294(b) and 324 IPC and Sections
3(l)(r), 3(l)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2014.
3. The respondent police, after completing the investigation, has
filed the final report and the same was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2020.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that
that the appellant is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
above case. He would further submit that the appellant is in judicial custody
from 19.12.2022.
5. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned
Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent as
well as the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit
that the prosecution has already examined the prosecution witnesses and the
case is now stand posted for cross-examination of P.W.12.
6. Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the fact
that the case is pending from 2016 onwards and also taking note of the fact
that the trial is at the fag end, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the appellant
on bail. However, the trial Court is directed to complete the trial and dispose
of the case in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2020 within a period of two months from the
date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
7. With the above direction, this Criminal Appeal is disposed of.
28.04.2023
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
csm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.
csm
To
1.The Sessions Judge,
Special Court for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam Sub Division, Theni District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.A.(MD)No.239 of 2023
Dated : 28.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!