Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4934 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2023
S.A.No.846 of 2002
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
S.A.No.846 of 2002
1.Saraswathy Amma
2.Vijayakumar
3.Sudhakumari
4.Sreekumar
5.Chandran ...Appellants
vs.
1.Kolappan Pillai
2.Murukesan
3.Ganesan
4.Veronickam
5.Jayarani
6.Mellin
7.Felcit
8.Packianathan
9.Muthayyan
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.846 of 2002
10.Ramayyan
11.Thanumalayan
12.Bhagavathy
13.Peerukannu
14.Appu Pillai
15.Saraswathy
16.Krishna Pillai
17.Syamala
18.Vasantha
19.Nesamani
20.Rasalayyan
21.Chempakakutti Pillai
22.Narayana Pillai
23.Chellappan Pillai
24.Selvaraj ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2001 in A.S.No.
88 of 1995 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai setting aside
the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.1995 in O.S.No.59 of 1971 on the
file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai.
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.846 of 2002
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 26.04.2023, the
learned counsel who appeared for the appellants submitted that the
appellants have not turned up and has filed a Memo dated 26.04.2023 to
that effect. Therefore, Registry was directed to cancel the vakalath filed
by the appellants counsel and list the matter on 27.04.2023 under the
caption 'for dismissal', by printing the name of the appellants.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no
representation for the appellants. The appeal is of the year 2002. Despite
sufficient opportunity being given to the appellants, the appellants have
not come forward to proceed with the appeal effectively. Therefore, this
Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with cost of Rs.
1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) payable by the appellants to the
Registry to the credit of S.A.No.846 of 2002. In case the appellants file
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.846 of 2002
any application to restore the appeal, Registry is directed not to take the
application on file unless the appellants deposit the cost imposed by this
Court.
27.04.2023
NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
mbi
To
1.The Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.846 of 2002
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
mbi
S.A.No.846 of 2002
27.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!