Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4389 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2023
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
A.Karuppaswamy ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1. O.A.Ramasamy
2. Sampath Kumar ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.02.2011 made
in A.S.No. 49 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Judge and Fast
Track Court No.IV, Naïve, Coimbatore at Tiruppur and confirmed the
Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.2010 made in O.S.No. 89 of 2006 on the
file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur.
***
For Appellant : Mr. V.Anandhamoorthy
For Respondents : Mr. A.Kripakaran
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
JUDGMENT
This Court did not admit the Second Appeal but ordered notice
regarding admission. I am not willing to admit the appeal for the
following reasons:-
1. This is a simple suit for recovery of money. According to the
plaintiff, he entered into an agreement with the defendants on 15.04.1994.
The agreement was for the purpose of sale of the suit schedule mentioned
property. According to him, the defendants were postponing the sale of
the property which constrained him to issue a notice on 03.04.2006. A
reply was issued on 10.04.2006 denying the agreement. Since the amount
was not paid, the plaintiff levied the suit for recovery of money of
Rs.2,19,510/-, being the principal of Rs.90,000/- with interest at the rate of
12% from 15.04.1994 till the date of presentation of the plaint, namely,
13.04.2006.
2. Mr. V.Anandhamoorthy, learned counsel for the appellant
would argue that the appropriate provision of limitation which will apply
to the suit is under Article 62. According to him, an agreement of sale will
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
amount to a charge on the property and therefore, the period of limitation
is 12 years and before the expiry of 12 years, he had presented the plaint.
3. I am not in agreement with the learned counsel. A charge is
created under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act either by an
order of Court or by law. This is a mere agreement of sale. There is no
creation of charge. No interest in the immovable property is transferred. It
continues to be in the realm of contract. The period of limitation for
recovery of advance amount is only for three years. By clever drafting, it
cannot be brought under Article 62. The suit is being hopelessly barred by
limitation. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed with costs throughout.
4. The Judgment and Decree of the Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur,
in O.S.No. 89 of 2006 dated 19.01.2010 as confirmed by the Judgment and
Decree of the learned Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court
No.IV, Naïve, Coimbatore, at Tiruppur, in A.S.No. 49 of 2010 dated
28.02.2011 are confirmed. The Second Appeal is dismissed with costs
throughout.
18.04.2023
Index :Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
vsg
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.
vsg
To
1. Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court No.IV, Naïve, Coimbatore, at Tiruppur
2. Principal Sub Court, Tiruppur.
S.A.No. 1506 of 2011
18.04.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!