Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4310 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2023
W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
V.Parameswari ... Appellant
-vs-
1.The Director General of Police,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Superintendent of Police,
Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.
3.The Sub-Inspector of Police,
South Tamaraikulam Police Station,
Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order,
dated 12.01.2022, passed in W.P.(MD) No.3570 of 2018, on the file of this Court.
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
For Appellant : Mr.M.Saravanakumar
For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar
Government Advocate
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
The Writ Court has rejected the claim of the appellant for
compassionate appointment solely on the ground of delay. It is seen that the
husband of the petitioner, who was working as a Head Constable, died on
04.11.2003. The petitioner made an application for seeking compassionate
appointment for her daughter P.Subhashini on 19.12.2003. However, the said
Subhashini did not furnish the documents/certificates required despite reminders
issued by the Department. Thereafter, on 15.02.2006, the petitioner applied for
compassionate appointment for her son P.Maheswaran. However, the application
made by the petitioner seeking compassionate appointment for her son in the year
2006 was as usual kept pending by the Department without either being rejected
or accepted. The petitioner also did not take any action. She allowed matters to
drift till 18.07.2017 when she sent a reminder. Acting on the reminder, the
respondents had rejected the request.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
2. The Writ Court has dismissed the writ petition solely on the
ground of delay and laches. The respondents are bound to dispose of the
application seeking compassionate appointment within a reasonable period but,
the inaction on the part of the respondents, which is not uncommon, cannot give a
right to the petitioner to resurrect a stale claim and seek compassionate
appointment fourteen years after the death of the government employee. We are
unable to fault the Writ Court for having dismissed the writ petition on the ground
of delay. Hence, the writ appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
17.04.2023
NCC : No
Index : No
Internet : Yes
PKN
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
To:
1.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.
3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, South Tamaraikulam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
PKN
W.A.(MD) No.417 of 2023
17.04.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!