Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3889 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2023
W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:06.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P(MD).No.7667 of 2023
and WMP(MD)No.7125 of 2023
1. G.Srinivasan
2. S.Selvarni
... Petitioners
Vs
1. The District Revenue Officer,
District Collector Office Campus,
Madurai District, Madurai- 625 020.
2. Selvaraj V
... Respondents
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the
first respondent, dated 06.03.2023 in proceedings Na.Ka.No.
G5/E-117252/2022 quash the same as the same is arbitrary, in colorable
exercise of power in suppression of O.S.No. 181 of 2022, on the file of the
learned Sub Court, Usilampatti.
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
For Petitioner :Mr. R.G.Shankar Ganesh
For R1 :Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard, Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh, the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan, learned Special Government
Pleader appearing for the first respondent.
2.The writ petition has been filed questioning the issuance of
notice by the first respondent, dated 06.03.2023 in proceedings in Na.Ka.No.
G5/E-117252/2022, since it is stated that it is a colorable exercise of power in
suppression of pendency of O.S.No. 181 of 2022, on the file of the learned
Sub Court, Usilampatti.
3.If a suit is pending, the District Revenue Officer would never
know about the pendency, unless it is brought to his knowledge. In that suit,
the petitioners are the third and fourth defendants. The second respondent is
the second plaintiff. The suit had been filed, seeking a declaration that the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
suit property is the absolute property of the plaintiffs therein and for
permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, which also include the
petitioners herein from interfering with peaceful possession and for
declaration that the registered settlement deed, dated 26.07.2021 executed by
the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is null and void and for
declaration that the registered settlement deed, dated 22.09.2021 executed by
the second defendant in favour of the third defendant/second petitioner herein
is null and void and for declaration that the registered settlement deed, dated
28.02.2022 executed by the third defendant/second petitioner herein in favour
of the fourth respondent/first petitioner herein is null and void. It is thus seen
from the suit that the title claimed by the petitioners are put in question.
4.It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners
that earlier one Chellam claiming to be the owner of the property, filed a suit
in O.S.No.19 of 1998, before the District Munsif, Usilampatti. That suit was
dismissed by Judgment and decree, dated 20.02.2001, against which, a First
Appeal had been filed in A.S.No.72 of 2001, before the Sub Court,
Usilampatti. It was also dismissed by Judgment and decree, dated
25.02.2010. Further, a Second Appeal was also filed in S.A.No.884 of 2011.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
The same had been dismissed as abated by Judgment and decree, dated
14.10.2020. It is therefore stated that the suit filed in O.S.No.181 of 2022,
before the District Munsif, Usilampatti is a re-litigation of the same issue
once again. This fact should be brought to the knowledge of the first
respondent.
5.A direction is given to the petitioners/third and fourth
defendants in O.S.No.181 of 2022 to point out before the first respondent,
about the earlier round of litigation and about the present suit pending and
impress upon the first respondent that since the suit is pending, it only
appropriate that the first respondent should refrain from passing order.
Thereafter, the first respondent shall take a decision, keeping in mind the
earlier Judgments and decrees and the fact that in the earlier litigation the
matter went upto second appeal and also the facts in O.S.No.181 of 2022 and
decide whether he can still decide upon the title of the properties or upon the
nature of property as per the revenue records.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
6.This Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
06.04.2023 NCS :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
PNM
To
1. The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office Campus, Madurai District, Madurai- 625 020.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7667 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
PNM
ORDER IN W.P(MD).No.7667 of 2023 and WMP(MD)No.7125 of 2023
06.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!