Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3842 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2023
S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.10171 of 2017
Chellappa ... Appellant
/Vs./
Muthukrishnan ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code to allow the Second Appeal and consequently set aside the partly
modified decree and judgment of the learned Principal District Judge,
Tirunelveli, dated 30.06.2017 made in A.S.No.18 of 2016 of paying Rs.
3,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% till the date of decree and 6%
subsequent to the decree till the date of realization forthwith as against
the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor,
Tirunelveli District, dated 05.01.2016 made in O.S.No.155 of 2014 of
ordering the relief of specific performance of ordering the relief of
specific performance of contract with subsequent permanent injunction
in relation to the sale of suit property forthwith.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
For Appellant : Mr.S.Palani Velayutham
For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has been
repeatedly seeking adjournments for reporting settlement of this second
appeal. On 14.03.2023, it was reported by both the counsels that talks of
settlement were going on between the parties and in all likelihood,
settlement would be reached within a period of one week. Only on the
request made by both the counsels, the matter was adjourned to
24.03.2023 for reporting settlement.
2. On 24.03.2023, it was reported by the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant that though he has received oral instructions
from his client that the matter has been settled between the parties, he
sought for further time to get written instructions and report settlement of
the matter before this Court. After recording the statement made by the
learned counsel appearing for the appellant and on his request, the matter
was adjourned today, ie., 05.04.2023.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
3. Even today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is
not able to report settlement of the matter, but instead he seeks further
time for reporting settlement.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent also submits
that even though there was a proposal given by the appellant for
settlement earlier, the appellant had not contacted the respondent
thereafter for arriving at a settlement.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant is also not
ready to argue the matter today. It can now be inferred that the appellant
is not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal. Accordingly, this
Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order
as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
05.04.2023
Index : Yes / No
NCC : Yes / No
Sm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Sm
TO:
1.The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.
2.The Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.481 of 2017
Dated:
05.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!