Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3730 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2023
W.P.( MD) No.7565 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.P. (MD) No.7565 of 2023
and W.M.P. (MD) Nos.7049 and 7050 of 2023
Asiya Begum ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Member Secretary,
The Tuticorin Town and Country Planning Authority,
No.51, West Car Street,
Tuticorin.
2. The Commissioner,
Kayalpattinam Municipality,
Kayalpattinam,
Tuticorin. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records
relating to the impugned order made by the 2nd respondent in NA.KA.No.
441/2020/F1 dated 28.03.2023 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.( MD) No.7565 of 2023
For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar
Government Advocate
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by
the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.441/2020/F1 dated 28.03.2023.
2. Heard Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, learned counsel for the
petitioner, who has complained that, there was no compliance within the
meaning of Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country
Planning Act, 1971.
3. Though in this regard Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar, learned
Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents has submitted
that on 25.02.2022 notice under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District
Municipalities Act, 1920 had been issued, no specific notice invoking
Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act,
1971, has been issued.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.( MD) No.7565 of 2023
4. In this context, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied
upon a Division Bench Judgment in the matter of A.Manickavel v. The
District Collector, Tuticorin District reported in 2017(1) CWC 288, where
the previous notice, since has been given under Section 56(1)(b) dispensing
with the minimum of 30 days notice of the said Act, has been dealt with.
5. In view of the above stated legal as well as factual position, this
Court feels that the order impugned would not stand in the legal scrutiny
and therefore, we are inclined to pass the following order:-
That the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted
back to the respondents for reconsideration. The first respondent shall give
notice by compling with Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and
Country Planning Act, 1971, i.e., 30 days notice and after getting the reply
from the petitioner within the said time further course of action in
accordance with law can be taken by the first respondent
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.( MD) No.7565 of 2023
6. With these directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
(R.S.K., J.) & (K.K.R.K, J.)
03.04.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
SJ
To
1.The Member Secretary,
The Tuticorin Town and Country Planning Authority, No.51, West Car Street, Tuticorin.
2. The Commissioner, Kayalpattinam Municipality, Kayalpattinam, Tuticorin.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.( MD) No.7565 of 2023
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
SJ
W.P. (MD) No.7565 of 2023
03.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!