Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V. Kamaraj vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 15830 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15830 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2022

Madras High Court
V. Kamaraj vs The Secretary To Government on 10 October, 2022
                                                                                W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                  DATED: 10.10.2022
                                                       CORAM:
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                            AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
                                         Writ Petition Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015
                                       and WP No.1 of 2015 in WP No.1465 of 2015


                     V. Kamaraj                                   ..Petitioner in WP No.1464 of 2015

                     M. Panneerselvam                             ..Petitioner in WP No.1465 of 2015

                                                            Vs.

                     1. The Secretary to Government
                        School Education Department,
                        Fort St. George, Chennai 9.

                     2. The Director of School Education,
                        College Road, Chennai 6.                  .. Respondents 1&2 in

both the petitions

3. The District Educational Officer, Thiruvaru, Thiruvarur District.

4. The Headmaster, National Higher Secondary School, Mannargudi 614 001.

Thiruvarur District. .. Respondent 3 & 4 in WP 1464/15

3. The District Educational Officer, North Chennai, Egmore, Chennai 8.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

4. The Headmaster, T.T.V.Higher Secondary School, New No.199, Mint Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 600 079 .. Respondent 3 & 4 in WP 1465/15

Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

(i)WP No.1464/2015: to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to sanction incentive increments for acquiring M.Phil qualification by extending the benefits of the GO Ms.Nos.209 and 15 School Education Department dated 08.07.2010 and 28.03.2013 respectively to the petitioner.

(ii)WP No.1465/2015: to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.5243/A3/2014 dated 29.12.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction incentive increments for acquiring M.Phil qualification in the cadre of PG Assistant by extending the benefits of the GO Ms.Nos.209 and 15 School Education Department dated 08.07.2010 and 28.03.2013 respectively by the first respondent to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan (in both the petitions)

For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru (in both the petitions) Spl. Govt. Pleader, for RR 1 to 3

No appearance for R4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The Writ Petitions have been posted upon a reference being

answered by a Full Bench of this Court in WA No.3674 of 2019 etc. batch

dated 29.04.2022. A reference was made to a Full Bench in view of the

conflict between two Division Bench judgments of this Court, one in WA

(MD) Nos.701 and 769 of 2015 etc., dated 15.07.2015 (The Director of

School Education and others v. S.Amalraj) holding that a teacher is

entitled to a third set of incentive increment on account of acquiring higher

qualification and the other in WA No.1664 of 2016 dated 29.06.2018 (The

Director of School Education and others v. V.Dhanapal) taking a contrary

view and concluding that a teacher, during the entire tenure of service,

would be entitled to only two sets of incentive increments and nothing

more.

2. Upon a reference being made, the Full Bench had answered the

issue concluding that the judgment of the Division Bench in WA. No.1664

of 2016 dated 29.06.2018 reflects the correct position of law. After

considering the various Government Orders issued on the subject, the Full

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

Bench had observed as follows:

“12. A perusal of the above order puts the

issue beyond pale of doubt that as per the policy of the

Government, a teacher for the entire period of his/her

service shall be granted two incentives (four

increments) only. Therefore, there cannot be any dispute

regarding the fact that a Secondary Grade Teacher or

B.T.Assistant or Post Graduate Teacher during the

entire period of service as a teacher, is entitled to get

only two incentive increments. Taking note of the same

only, the Division Bench in W.A.No.1664 of 2016 dated

29.06.2018 (The Director of School Education and

others v. V.Dhanapal) has categorically held that the

acquisition of an M.Phil. qualification does not entitle a

teacher for a third incentive increment, in view of

G.O.Ms.No.1024, Education, Science and Technology

Department, dated 09.12.1993 restricting the number of

incentive increments to two and therefore, any teacher

is not entitled to a third incentive increment.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

3. An attempt is made by Mr.Sasidharan and Mr.Ganesan,

appearing for some of the teachers to contend that those teachers who have

obtained the additional qualification prior to 09.12.1993, namely the date on

which G.O.Ms.Nos.1023 and 1024 came to be issued would be entitled to

incentive increments, since the number of increments was limited only by

the said two Government Orders. We are unable to accept the said

contention of the learned counsel appearing for some of the respondents

because the Full Bench has categorically held that any teacher during the

entire period of his/her tenure would be entitled only to two sets of

incentive increments.

4. In view of the categorical pronouncement of the Full Bench

extracted above, we cannot take any other view. Hence the Writ Petitions

filed by the petitioners in both the petitions seeking incentive increments

will stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) (K.KUMARESH BABU, J.) jv 10.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

Index: Yes/no Internet: Yes/no speaking order/non speaking order

To

1. The Secretary to Government School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9.

2. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 6.

3. The District Educational Officer, Thiruvaru, Thiruvarur District.

4. The Headmaster, National Higher Secondary School, Mannargudi 614 001.

Thiruvarur District.

5. The District Educational Officer, North Chennai, Egmore, Chennai 8.

6. The Headmaster, T.T.V.Higher Secondary School, New No.199, Mint Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 600 079.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

(jv)

Writ Petition Nos.1464 & 1465 of 2015 and WP No.1 of 2015 in WP No.1465 of 2015

10.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter