Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.R. Venkattaraman vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 17421 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17421 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2022

Madras High Court
Dr.R. Venkattaraman vs The Secretary To Government on 9 November, 2022
                                                                           W.P.No.29774 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               Dated : 09.11.2022

                                                    CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                           W.P.No.29774 of 2022
                                    and W.M.P.Nos.29167 & 29168 of 2022
                  1.Dr.R. Venkattaraman
                  2.Dr.T. Aruvi
                  3.Dr.S. Bindhuraj
                  4.Dr.B. Vishan
                  5.Dr.S. Arun
                  6.Dr.Vinoth
                  7.Dr.R. Ramachandran
                  8.Dr.S. Pushkaran
                  9.Dr.Rajamurugan
                  10.Dr.P.S. Karthikeyan
                  11.Dr.W. Bernal Sam Roy                                 .. Petitioners

                                                      Vs.

                  1.The Secretary to Government,
                    Health and Family Welfare Department,
                    Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

                  2.The Director of Public Health
                     and Preventive Medicines,
                    DMS Buildings,
                    Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.
                  3.The Chairman,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  1/8
                                                                                  W.P.No.29774 of 2022


                     Medical Services Recruitment Board (MRB),
                     7th Floor, DMS Buildings,
                     358, Anna Salai, Teynampet,
                     Chennai – 600 006.                                         .. Respondents

                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                  praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent
                  authorities to grant regular appointment as Assistant Surgeon considering the
                  Covid-19 duty rendered by the petitioners in all three Covid-19 waves and
                  their eligibility in the Medical Recruitment Board Examination 2018, in the
                  existing vacancies within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.
                                  For Petitioners    : Mr.S. Thanka Sivan

                                  For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu,
                                                    Additional Government Pleader [R1 & R2]
                                                    Mr.M. Loganathan
                                                    Standing Counsel [R3]


                                                        ORDER

This Writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction

to the respondents to grant regular appointment to the petitioners as Assistant

Surgeons, considering the Covid-19 duty rendered by them during all three

Covid-19 waves and considering the fact that they have already passed the

Medical Recruitment Board Examination for the year 2018, within a time

frame to be fixed by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr.Stalin Abimanyu,

learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the

respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.M. Loganathan, learned standing counsel accepts

notice on behalf of 3rd respondent. By consent of both the parties, this Writ

Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The question of issuing a positive direction as sought for in this writ

petition, will not arise at this stage. The only limited relief that can be granted

to the petitioners is to direct the respondents to consider the representation

seeking for grant of regular appointment as Assistant Surgeons.

4. The petitioners contend that they were directed to do Covid-19 duties

during the three waves. They also contend that they had earlier passed the

examination conducted by the Medical Recruitment Board in the year 2018.

According to them, they had passed the examination but were not selected as

Assistant Surgeons pursuant to the Medical Recruitment Board Examination

conducted in the year 2018.

5. The petitioners also rely upon a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

Court in 'Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2021' in 'In Re:

Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services During Pandemic'. In

particular, the observance made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraphs

66 & 67, is relied upon by the petitioners for the purpose of substantiating their

claim that having rendered Covid-19 service on all the three waves as Health

Care Professions who had combated the Covid-19 pandemic, their case for

appointment as Assistant Surgeons ought to have been considered as per the

aforementioned judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

6. According to the petitioners, though the order was passed by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court on 30.04.2021, the said order was ignored in the

subsequent notification issued by the Medical Recruitment Board and no

preference was granted to similarly placed petitioners, who had done Covid-19

duties during all the three waves. It is further contended by the petitioners that

by the notification dated 03.05.2021, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,

MEP Section, Government of India in Clause 17 therein, has recommended to

the State/UT Governments to consider giving preference in regular

Government appointments of Health professionals through the respective

Public Service Commission/other recruitment bodies, for those Health

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

Professionals under this special scheme, who complete a minimum of 100 days

of Covid related duty. The petitioners contend that having been completed

more than 100 days of Covid-19 related duties, they ought to have been

appointed as Assistant Surgeons.

7. As observed earlier, this Court cannot grant any positive direction as

sought for in this writ petition.

8. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first

and second respondents and the learned standing counsel for the third

respondent/Board, in unison, submit that the petitioners are not entitled to be

appointed as Assistant Surgeons, as according to them, the petitioners were

appointed only on contract basis and they do not have any vested right for

appointment as Assistant Surgeons. According to them, having failed to get

selected in the year 2018, they cannot now seek for regular appointment as

Assistant Surgeons.

9. The above contention of the learned counsels is disputed by the

learned counsel for the petitioners, who would reiterate that the petitioners are

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

entitled for being recruited as Assistant Surgeons.

10. This Court is of the considered view that no prejudice will be caused

to the respondents if the petitioners' representation seeking for regular

appointment as Assistant Surgeons, is considered on merits and in accordance

with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

11. The petitioners have given several representations including the last

representation on 26.10.2022. However, this Court is of the considered view

that the petitioners will have to give a fresh representation to the respondents

to enable them to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.

12. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioners to submit

a fresh representation to the first and second respondents seeking for grant of

regular appointment as Assistant Surgeons, considering the Covid-19 duty

rendered by them during all three Covid-19 waves and their eligibility in the

Medical Recruitment Board Examination 2018, in the existing vacancy, within

a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On

receipt of the said representation, the first and second respondents shall pass

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8)

weeks thereafter. The petitioners are directed to send a copy of the judgment

of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30.04.2021in 'Suo Motu Writ Petition

(Civil) No.3 of 2021' in 'In Re: Distribution of Essential Supplies and

Services During Pandemic' and the Central Government notification dated

03.05.2021, for the respondents consideration.

13. With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

09.11.2022 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

Sni

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

Sni

To

1.The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicines, DMS Buildings, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The chairman, Medical Services Recruitment Board (MRB), 7th Floor, DMS Buildings, 358, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

W.P.No.29774 of 2022

09.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter