Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6625 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5734 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.5734 of 2022
K.Vinothkumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
Chandrasekar ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call
for the records relating to the return docket order in C.A.No.SR.7142 of 2021
dated 22.12.2021 on the file of the Learned Principal District and Sessions
Judge, Thoothukudi and set aside the same and direct the Learned Principal
District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi to take the appeal on file and
suspension of sentence petition filed by the petitioner and dispose the
suspension of sentence petition in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mano Kumar
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the return
docket order in C.A.No.SR.7142 of 2021 dated 22.12.2021 on the file of the
learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi and set aside the
same and direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5734 of 2022
to take the appeal on file and suspension of sentence petition filed by the
petitioner and dispose the suspension of sentence petition in accordance with
law.
2. The petitioner is an accused on the complaint lodged by the respondent
for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
The same has been taken cognizance in CC.No.10 of 2019 on the file of the
Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Kovilpatti and the petitioner was found
guilty. The Trial Court convicted the petitioner and sentenced him to undergo
one year and three months imprisonment and also directed to pay the cheque
amount as compensation.
3. On the date of judgment, the petitioner did not appear before the Trial
Court and as such, the Trial Court issued non-bailable warrant as against the
petitioner. Aggrieved by the judgment passed against the petitioner, he
preferred an appeal before the Appellate Court and also filed a petition for
suspension of sentence. When the non-bailable warrant is pending against the
petitioner, the First Appellate Court returned the appeal papers for the reason
that the suspension of sentence petition is not maintainable, since the sentence
was not suspended by the Trial Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5734 of 2022
4. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed
by the Court below. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However,
the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Trial Court by filing a petition for
recall of non-bailable warrant issued against him and the same may be
considered by the Trial Court on merits and in accordance with law on the same
day.
30.03.2022
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
Lm
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
The Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Kovilpatti
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5734 of 2022
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Lm
Crl.O.P(MD).No.5734 of 2022
30.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!