Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

L.Muralidharan vs S.Antony Raj
2022 Latest Caselaw 6597 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6597 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2022

Madras High Court
L.Muralidharan vs S.Antony Raj on 30 March, 2022
                                                                             A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 30.03.2022

                                                       CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

                                              A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019
                                                        and
                                            C.M.P. (MD) No. 5245 of 2021


                     L.Muralidharan                                   ... Appellant / Defendant


                                                       Vs.


                     S.Antony Raj                                     ... Respondent / Plaintiff


                     PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code,
                     1908 against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District
                     Judge (Fast Track), Tenkasi dated 08.03.2018 in O.S. No. 121 of 2016.

                                     For Petitioner    :     No appearance

                                     For Respondents   :      Mr.S.S.Thesigan




                     _________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019


                                                  JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree of the

learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track), Tenkasi, dated 08.03.2018

made in O.S. 121 of 2016.

2.The appellant was the defendant in the suit; the respondent / plaintiff has

filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.33,73,333/- (Rupees Thirty Three

Lakhs Seventy Three Thousand and Three Hundred and Thirty Three only)

being the advance amount with interest on the sale agreement, dated

14.05.2012 with subsequent interest and costs; however, the suit has been

decreed only in respect of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) with

subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of agreement

till the date of realization with the cost of Rs.2,95,897/- (Rupees Two Lakhs

Ninety Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety Seven only).

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019

3.Though the appellant / defendant has raised various grounds in this

appeal, he has restricted his prayer with regard to awarding of interest and

cost alone. Only in view of that, he has valued the appeal itself at Rs.

13,95,341/- (Rupees Thirteen Lakhs Ninety Five Thousand Three Hundred

and Forty One only) and paid the Court fee of Rs.41,861/- (Rupees Forty

One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty One only). There is no break-up of

figures to show how this contested amount of Rs.13,95,341/- (Rupees

Thirteen Lakhs Ninety Five Thousand Three Hundred and Forty One only)

has been arrived at. It is presumably understood that the appellant has

worked out the interest alone on the earnest money and challenged it in this

appeal; the suit agreement was of the year 14.05.2012. However, the

plaintiff has not chosen to file any suit for specific performance. On perusal

of the agreement, it is seen that the interest clause, is not present; though the

respondent / plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 12% per annum, it is

the discretion of the Court to award interest on refund by taking into

consideration of the rate of interest which would be available if the amount

was deposited in any of the Nationalized Bank. Since the award of interest

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019

at 12% per annum is on the higher side, I feel that it can be reduced to 9%

per annum from the date of sale agreement till the date of decree and

thereafter, 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization

with cost.

In the result, this Appeal Suit is partly allowed and the judgment and decree

in O.S. No. 121 of 2016 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast

Track), Tenkasi, dated 08.03.2018, is hereby modified to the effect that the

suit is decreed for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.20,00,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum

from the date of sale agreement till the date of decree and thereafter, at the

rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization with

cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

30.03.2022 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019

To

1. The learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track), Tenkasi

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019

R.N.MANJULA, J.

vji

A.S. (MD) No. 40 of 2019 and C.M.P. (MD) No. 5245 of 2021

30.03.2022

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter