Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6459 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022
W.P(MD)No.5481 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No. 5481 of 2022
S.Rethinam .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Karur,
Karur District.
2.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance
Company Limited, Chennai,
Branch Office at Trichy,
represented by its
Authorized Officer N.Surendrakumar .. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for
records pertaining to the Impugned Order in Cr.M.P.No.553/2021
dated 10.12.2021 passed by the Respondent No.1 and quash the
same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan
ORDER
[Made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.]
1. The present writ petition has been filed
challenging the order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Karur under Section 14(1) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.5481 of 2022
Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
2. The petitioner has borrowed from the respondent
finance company and he was issued with a notice under Section
13(2) the Act on 30.07.2021 and thereafter a notice under Section
13(4) on 21.10.2021. The possession notice was also published in
two newspapers. Thereafter, the respondent finance company
approached learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur in Cr.M.P.No.
553 of 2021 for taking possession of the secured assets. Learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur, after hearing the submissions made
on the side of the company had passed an order, appointing an
Advocate Commissioner, to take possession of the properties, which
are the secured assets. The said order is under challenge in this writ
petition.
3. The Division Bench of our High Court in the
judgment reported in 2021 (3) CTC 383 (Karvy Financial Services
Ltd and others v District Magistrate and District Collector, Chennai
and others dated 23.04.2021), has also held that the scope and
power of the authority under Section 14 of the Act is just
administrative in character in order to assist in taking possession of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.5481 of 2022
the secured assets and the borrower need not be heard by the Chief
Judicial Magistrate before passing an order under Section 14 of the
Act. The only remedy available to the borrower is to approach the
Debts Recovery Tribunal by challenging the possession notice under
Section 13(4) of the Act by way of filing an appeal under Section 17
of the said Act.
4. The grounds raised by the writ petitioner cannot
be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, the
dismissal of this petition will not stand in the way of the writ
petitioner from approaching the Debts Recovery Tribunal. No costs.
Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD) Nos. 4437 & 4438 of 2020 are
closed.
[P.U., J] [R.V., J]
29.03.2022
Index : No
ssm/15
To
The Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Karur,
Karur District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.5481 of 2022
PARESH UPADHYAY, J.
and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
ssm
W.P(MD)No.5481 of 2022
29.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!