Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6196 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2022
C.M.A.(MD)No.1384 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.A(MD)No.1384 of 2015
and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
Sh.S.Jegadesan @ Surya ... Appellant / Appellant
-Vs-
Special Director of Enforcement Directorate,
New Delhi ... Respondent / Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of
C.P.C. r/w Section 54 of FERA, praying this Court to set aside the
Appeal No.151 of 2009 on the file of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign
Exchange, New Delhi, dated 24.08.2015.
For Appellant : Mrs.N.Krishnaveni,
Senior Counsel,
For Mr.P.Thiagarajan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Anand Raj,
For Mr.R.Vijaya Rajan
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD)No.1384 of 2015
JUDGMENT
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
The appellant challenges the order of the Appellate Tribunal for
Foreign Exchange, directing pre-deposit of 15% of the penalty imposed
against the appellant, within a period of 30 days from the date of
communication of the order, as a pre-condition for entertaining the
appeal.
2.By the very same order impugned in this appeal, the Tribunal
had directed one Ashok Kumar Doshi also, co-accused in this case, to
make such pre-deposit. It is now brought to our notice that the said
Ashok Kumar Doshi had challenged the said order before the Calcutta
High Court in W.P.No.144 of 2016. By order dated 05.05.2016, the
Calcutta High Court has set aside the order and permitted him to
prosecute the appeal without pre-deposit.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.1384 of 2015
3.Though the learned counsel for the respondent has contended
that pre-deposit is an essential condition, since the Calcutta High Court
had permitted another accused in the same case to prosecute the appal
without pre-deposit, we do not think that we should take a different view.
More so, since the order of the Calcutta High Court dated 05.05.2016 has
not been challenged and has become final, this Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal is allowed and the appellant is entitled to prosecute the appeal
without having to deposit any amount by way of pre-deposit. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.S.M.,J.] & [N.S.K.,J.] 25.03.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Myr
To The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.1384 of 2015
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Myr
JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A.(MD)No.1384 of 2015
25.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!