Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6094 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5519 of 2022
K.Balakrishnan ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. State through
The Superintendent of Police,
O/o. Superintendent of Police,
Pudukkottai District,
Pudukkottai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Thirumayam Police Station,
Thirumayam,
Pudukkottai District.
3. Kaliaperumal ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to
direct R1 and R2 to take over the possession of the property from the R3 and
to hand over the same to the petitioner and further to issue adequate police
protection to the petitioner for his life and limb and the property situated in
natham Survey Nos.90/5, 90/6 and 90/7 at Panangudi Revenue Village,
Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the light of the petitioner's
representation, dated 01.03.2022 and 16.03.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhana Krishnan
For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi
No.1 & 2 Additional Public Prosecutor
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking direction to direct first and second
respondents to take over the possession of the property from the third
respodent and to hand over the same to the petitioner and further to issue
adequate police protection to the petitioner for his life and limb and the
property situated in natham Survey Nos.90/5, 90/6 and 90/7 at Panangudi
Revenue Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the light of the
petitioner's representation, dated 01.03.2022 and 16.03.2022.
2. The petitioner owned property in S.Nos. 90/5,90/6 and 90/7 at
Panangudi Revenue Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District. However
the third respondent filed O.S.No. 26 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sub
Court, Pudukottai for exeuction and the same was ordered in his favour.
Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed a Civil Revision Petition
before this Court in CRP(MD) No.234 of 2021 and this Court by an order
dated 06.12.2021 set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Principal
Sub Court, Pudukottai. Further this Court also set aside the sale deed
executed in favour of the third respondent and directed the petitioner to
deposit a sumof Rs.2,00,000/- and accordingly the petitioner deposited the
said amount. However the third respondent failed to hand over the possession https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
to the petitioner in respect of the subject property. Therefore, it is clear that
all the allegations are civil in nature and the petitioner ought to have
approached the civil Court in the manner known to law.
3. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as devoid of
merits.
24.03.2022
Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order aav
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J.,
aav
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5519 of 2022
24.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!