Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Naagarajan vs The Presiding Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 5890 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5890 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2022

Madras High Court
K.Naagarajan vs The Presiding Officer on 23 March, 2022
                                                                            C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022
                                                                     and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020



                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED:    23.03.2022

                                                        CORAM :

                        THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                           AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY


                                                 C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022
                                              and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020

                     K.Naagarajan                                             .. Applicant/
                                                                                 Appellant

                                                           Vs

                     1.The Presiding Officer,
                       Labour Court,
                       Salem.

                     2.The Management of Titan Industries Limited,
                       (Watches Division),
                       Plot No.3, SIPCOT Industrial Complex,
                       Hosur,
                       Krishnagiri District - 635 126.                        .. Respondents/
                                                                                 Respondents
                     Prayer:
                                  C.M.P.No.4824 of 2022 has been filed under Section 5 of the
                     Limitation Act to condone the delay of 811 days in filing the appeal
                     against the order dated 01.11.2019 in W.P.No.18158 of 2014.


                     ____________
                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022
                                                                               and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020




                                  W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
                     Patent against the order 01.11.2019 in W.P.No.18158 of 2014.


                                      For the Applicant/           : Mr.Thamaraiselvan
                                      Appellant

                                                            JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Heard on the application for condonation of delay of 811 days in

fling the appeal.

2. The affidavit in support of the application has been filed to

state that the writ petition filed by the second respondent

Management against the award of the Labour Court was allowed by

the order dated 01.11.2019. A copy of the order was made ready

and, accordingly, instructed the erstwhile counsel to prefer an appeal

and, accordingly, it was filed on 12.12.2020, but the appeal papers

returned due to some defects. After complying the defects, it was to

be represented. But due to the outbreak of the pandemic Covid-19,

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022 and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020

steps could not be taken and, therefore, the delay of 811 days

occurred in filing the appeal.

3. We have considered the submissions made by learned

counsel for the applicant/writ appellant.

4. We find that the affidavit does not contain any explanation or

justification for filing the appeal on 12.12.2020, while the order is

dated 01.11.2019. The intervening period is of more than one year

and no explanation to it has been given in the affidavit. The

explanation of the delay is for a period subsequent to the expiry of

more than one year from the date of the order and getting the copy

of the same. In the absence of sufficient explanation for the delay

from the date of getting the copy till the filing of the appeal, we are

unable to accept the application, because the intervening period is

more than a year. Though subsequent to filing of the appeal, the

papers were returned due to some defects on 29.12.2020, steps were

not immediately taken for re-presenting the papers. Admittedly, the

erstwhile counsel received the papers on 04.01.2021, but no earnest

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022 and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020

steps were taken to re-present the same. Thereafter, the papers

were with the applicant from 04.01.2021 till 10.01.2022 and the

same have not been re-presented. According to the applicant, it was

on account of the pandemic, which plea cannot be sustained, as in

the year 2021, the second surge started in the month of April. That

apart, the Court was fully functional during the said period through

virtual mode without any restraint to re-present the case.

5. Looking to those facts and in the absence of sufficient

explanation for the delay of more than a year before filing the appeal

and even thereupon, we find no justification to accept the application

for condonation of the delay of 811 days in filing the appeal and it is

accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is rejected at the

SR stage itself. There will be no order as to costs.

                                                               (M.N.B., CJ)      (D.B.C., J.)
                                                                      23.03.2022
                     Index : Yes/No
                     bbr

                     To
                     The Presiding Officer,
                     Labour Court, Salem.


                     ____________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022 and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

bbr

C.M.P.No.4825 of 2022 and W.A.No. SR 89679 of 2020

23.03.2022

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter