Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4676 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2022
C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :09.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019
and
C.M.P(MD).No.6882 of 2019
Sivajirajan ...Petitioner/1st Defendant
Vs.
1.Soroobarani
2.Thangajothi ...Respondents/Plaintiffs
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 227 of the
Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the impugned fair
and decreetal order dated 25.01.2019 made in I.A.No.552 of 2018 in
O.S.No.67 of 2013 on the file of Subordinate Court, Kovilpatti and set aside
the same and allow this Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Athimoolapandian
For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil
for Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and
decreetal order dated 25.01.2019 made in I.A.No.552 of 2018 in O.S.No.67
1 /4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019
of 2013 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti.
2.I.A.No.552 of 2018 was filed by the revision petitioner/1st
defendant under Order 8 Rule (1-A)(3) of CPC., to receive the documents,
which was dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti.
Aggrieved by the said order, the revision petitioner/1st defendant has filed
this Civil Revision Petition.
3.A perusal of records shows that the document is an unregistered
partition deed, in which six members are the parties to the document, but
only four members were signed in the documents. Other two parties,
especially, the respondents/plaintiffs have not signed in the partition deed,
Therefore, the document cannot be marked, even cannot be received for
collateral purpose. As per judgment reported in 2010-2-L.W.828 in the
case of Narendra Kante Vs. Anuradha Kante & Ors. in paragraph No.22 as
follows:
''22.As far as the second question is concerned, a Deed of Family Settlement seeking to partition joint family properties cannot be relied
2 /4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019
upon unless signed by all the co-sharers.''
4.Unless all the parties have signed in the documents, the
documents cannot be received and cannot be looked into for a collateral
purpose. Therefore, the trial Court has rightly dismissed the said I.A.No.
552 of 2018. This Court finds no valid reasons to interfere with the order of
the Court below.
5.In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.
Since the suit is pending from the year 2013, the learned Subordinate Judge,
Kovilpatti, is directed to dispose of O.S.No.67 of 2013 within a period of
four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.03.2022
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
vsd
To
The Subordinate Court,
Kovilpatti.
3 /4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019
S.ANANTHI, J.
vsd
C.R.P(MD).No.1238 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD).No.6882 of 2019
09.03.2022
4 /4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!