Madras High Court
C.Kaladevi vs The State Through on 8 March, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
in
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6629 of 2020
C.Kaladevi ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State through
The Sub Inspector of Police,
Avaniyapuram Police Station,
Madurai City.
Crime No.97/2020.
2. A.Uma ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.to call
for the entire records in connection with the First Information Report in Crime
No.97 of 2020 register on the file of the 1st respondent police quash the same
such further or other orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi
Additional Public Prosecutor
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings
in Crime No. 97 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on 23.01.2020 due to property
dispute all the accused persons jointly visited the defacto complainant's house at
09.00AM and assaulted the defacto complainant. With the above allegations, the
respondent police registered the above FIR.
3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the
prosecution. Without any base, the first respondent police registered a case in
Crime No. 97 of 2020 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) IPC
& 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, as against the
petitioner.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the
investigation is completed and the respondent police are about to file the final
report before the concerned court.
5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
6. It is seen from the First Information Report that there are specific
allegations as against the petitioner, which have to be investigated. Further the
FIR is not an encyclopedia and it need not contain all facts. Further, it cannot be
quashed in the threshold. This Court finds that the FIR discloses prima facie
commission of cognizable offence and as such this Court cannot interfere with
the investigation. The investigating machinery has to step in to investigate, grab
and unearth the crime in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the Code.
7.It is also relevant to rely upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India passed in Crl.A.No.255 of 2019 dated 12.02.2019 - Sau. Kamal
Shivaji Pokarnekar vs. the State of Maharashtra & ors., as follows:-
"4. The only point that arises for our
consideration in this case is whether the High
Court was right in setting aside the order by which
process was issued. It is settled law that the
Magistrate, at the stage of taking cognizance and
summoning, is required to apply his judicial mind
only with a view to taking cognizance of the
offence, or in other words, to find out whether a
prima facie case has been made out for summoning
the accused persons. The learned Magistrate is not
required to evaluate the merits of the material or
evidence in support of the complaint, because the
Magistrate must not undertake the exercise to find
out whether the materials would lead to a
conviction or not.
5. Quashing the criminal proceedings is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis called for only in a case where the complaint does
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
not disclose any offence, or is frivolous, vexatious,
or oppressive. If the allegations set out in the
complaint do not constitute the offence of which
cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate, it is
open to the High Court to quash the same. It is not
necessary that a meticulous analysis of the case
should be done before the Trial to find out whether
the case would end in conviction or acquittal. If it
appears on a reading of the complaint and
consideration of the allegations therein, in the light
of the statement made on oath that the ingredients
of the offence are disclosed, there would be no
justification for the High Court to interfere.
6.........
7.........
8........
9. Having heard the learned Senior Counsel
and examined the material on record, we are of the
considered view that the High Court ought not to
have set aside the order passed by the Trial Court
issuing summons to the Respondents. A perusal of
the complaint discloses that prima facie, offences
that are alleged against the Respondents. The
correctness or otherwise of the said allegations has
to be decided only in the Trial. At the initial stage
of issuance of process it is not open to the Courts to
stifle the proceedings by entering into the merits of
the contentions made on behalf of the accused.
Criminal complaints cannot be quashed only on the
ground that the allegations made therein appear to
be of a civil nature. If the ingredients of the offence
alleged against the accused are prima facie made
out in the complaint, the criminal proceeding shall
not be interdicted."
8.In view of the above discussion, this Court is not inclined to quash the
First Information Report. Hence this Criminal Original Petition stands
dismissed. However, the first respondent police is directed to complete the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
investigation and file final report before the concerned Magistrate, within a
period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
08.03.2022
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PNM
Note:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct
copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1. The State through
The Sub Inspector of Police,
Avaniyapuram Police Station,
Madurai City.
Crime No.97/2020.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.
PNM
ORDER IN
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14254 of 2020
in Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.6629 of 2020
03.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
