Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4428 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022
Cont.P.No.222 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Contempt Petition No.222 of 2022
N.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner
vs
1. Kakarla Usha, I.A.S.,
Secretary to Government,
Education Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
2. K.Arivoli,
The Director of Elementary Education,
DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.
3. S.Jackkulin Rosi,
Block Development Officer,
The Additional Assistant Elementary
Educational Officer, Bhuvanagiri
Block, Cuddalore District. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,
1971, to punish the respondents 1 to 3 for willful disobedience of the
order of this Court dated 14.07.2021 made in W.A.No.422 of 2021.
For the Petitioner : Mr.A.Kumar
For the Respondents : Mrs.Mythreye Chandru
Spl.G.P. (Edn.)
*****
___________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.222 of 2022
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The contempt petition has been filed in reference to the
judgment dated 14.07.2021 passed by the Division Bench wherein no
direction has been given rather the appeal preferred by the appellant
was dismissed upholding the judgment of the learned Single Judge.
Thus, if at all compliance is to be sought, it is of the judgment of the
learned Single Judge and thus, contempt would be maintainable before
the learned Single Judge.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt
petition was earlier preferred before the learned Single Judge,
however, it was dismissed on account of the interim order passed in
the appeal and thereupon, the appeal was dismissed by the Division
Bench, thus, the contempt petition has been filed before the Division
Bench.
3. We do not find non-compliance of the judgment of the Division
Bench because the judgment therein is only affirming the judgment of
the learned Single Judge. The contempt is alleging non-compliance of
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.222 of 2022
the judgment of the learned Single Judge and thereby, the petition
would be maintainable before the learned Single Judge.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present
contempt petition with liberty to maintain it before the learned Single
Judge.
5. The prayer aforesaid is granted and otherwise, as per the
observation of the Division Bench also, the contempt would be
maintainable before the learned Single Judge now after the dismissal
of the writ appeal.
The contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed with the liberty
aforesaid.
(M.N.B., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
07.03.2022
Index : Yes/No
sra
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.222 of 2022
M.N.Bhandari, CJ.
and D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
(sra) To:
1. The Secretary to Government, Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
2. The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.
3. The Block Development Officer, The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Bhuvanagiri Block, Cuddalore District.
Cont.P.No.222 of 2022
07.03.2022
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!