Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4279 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022
1 S.A.(MD)No.658 OF 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD)No.658 of 2010 and
M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2010
1. N.Somasundaram
2. S.Davamani ... Appellants / Appellants /
Defendants
Vs.
A.N.Selvam ... Respondent / Respondent /
Plaintiff
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of
C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.02.2008
passed in A.S.No.39 of 2007 by the learned Principal District
Judge, Pudukkottai, dismissing the appeal and confirming the
Decree and Judgment dated 24.07.2006 passed in O.S.No.257
of 2002 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge,
Pudukkottai.
For Appellants : Mr.Madhavan,
for Mr.K.Balasubramani.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Baalasundaram
***
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
2 S.A.(MD)No.658 OF 2010
JUDGMENT
The defendants in O.S.No.257 of 2002 on the file of
the Sub Court, Pudukkottai, are the appellants in this second
appeal.
2. The suit was one for redemption of mortgage. The
appellants filed a counter claim. The trial Court decreed the
suit in favour of the plaintiff and dismissed the counter claim.
Challenging the same, the defendants filed A.S.No.39 of 2007
before the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai. The appeal
was dismissed on 22.02.2008. Challenging the same, this
second appeal came to be filed.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, I
suggested to the learned counsel on either side to explore
possibilities of settlement. I am happy to record that the
matter has been amicably settled. A joint memo of compromise
signed by the counsel has been filed. The appellants have paid
a sum of Rs.90,000/- by way of Demand Draft to the
respondent and the same has also been accepted. A copy of
the Demand Draft has also been enclosed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. This second appeal is disposed of in terms of the
joint memo of compromise and the joint compromise memo
shall form part of the decree. Since the issue has been
amicably settled without consuming the time of the Court, the
appellants are entitled to refund of Court fee. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
5. Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the
appellants.
04.03.2022
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1. The Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai.
2. The Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai.
3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
S.A.(MD)No.658 of 2010
04.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!