Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4250 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022
C.S.No. 397 of 2016(B)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 04.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
C.S.No. 397 of 2016 (B)
1.P.K. Karunakaran
2.K.Revathy
3.Thangamani (Deceased)
[3rd plaintiff as per order dated 12.07.2019
on memo in C.S.No.397 of 2016]
4.Anusuyadevi (Deceased)
[The plaintiffs 1, 2 and 4 and the
defendants 1 and 2 are the legal
heirs of the deceased]. ..Plaintiffs
Versus
1.Ramani
2.Harishankar
3.K.V.Vimalakrishnan
4.V.Thanigaivel
5.A.Kanchanamala
(Defendants 3 to 5 are brought on record
as legal-heirs of the 4th plaintiff as per order
dated 24.09.2021 in A.No.2617 of 2021) ..Defendants
Prayer: Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read
with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC., prays for a judgment and decree against
the defendants for (a) partitioning the schedule properties by metes and
bounds and allotting 1/4th share to the plaintiffs 1 and 2 jointly and 1/4th
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No. 397 of 2016(B)
share to the plaintiffs 3 and 4 each; (b) To rendition of accounts for the
amounts derived from the properties towards rents; (c) Permanent
Injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents or anybody
claiming under or on behalf of the defendants herein from in any manner
dealing with the schedule properties either by alienating, mortgaging,
leasing or in any other manner and (d) to pay the costs of the suit.
For Plaintiffs : Mr.K.V.Sundararajan
For D1 & D2 : Mr.R.M.Pradeepan
For Mr.Arunbabu
For D3 to D5 : Already set ex-parte
on 24.09.2021
----
JUDGEMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submitted that the
3rd plaintiff died on 07.01.2019 and the Class II legal heirs are already on
record. Subsequently, the 4th plaintiff also died on 14.01.2021 leaving
behind her husband and her children as her legal heirs. Since they did not
join as plaintiffs, they were impleaded as defendants 3 to 5 vide order
dated 24.09.2021 in A.No.2609 of 2021 and the defendants 3 to 5 have
already set expate. Now, due to their personal family circumstances, the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No. 397 of 2016(B)
plaintiffs 1 and 2 are not interested to prosecute the matter in the above
suit and they did not want to press the above suit. Hence, the above suit is
dismissed as not pressed. They have filed a Memo dated 19.02.2022 to
the above effect.
2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the plaintiffs and the memo, this Civil Suit stands dismissed
as not pressed. No costs.
04.03.2022
msm Speaking order : Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No. 397 of 2016(B)
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
msm
C.S.No. 397 of 2016 (B)
04.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!