Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4038 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022
W.A.No.400 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.400 of 2022
R.Babu,
representing on behalf of his
minor daughter B.Hemasri. .. Appellant
Vs
1.The Controller of Examiner,
Central Board of Secondary Education (Regional Office),
No.3, Old No.1630A J Block,
16th Main Road, Anna Nagar,
(Near Thirumangalam Signal)
Behind Sridevi Hospital,
Chennai-40.
2.The Vice Principal,
Kendriya Vidyalaya, AFS, Avadi,
Chennai-55. .. Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the
order dated 21.09.2021 in W.P.No.20098 of 2021.
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.400 of 2022
For the Appellant : Mr.B.Janarthkumar
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The appellant herein has filed the writ petition for issuance of a
direction on the respondents to clarify the marking scheme that
resulted in awarding of low marks to the appellant's daughter.
2. The writ court dismissed the writ petition finding no merit
and otherwise we find the ultimate grievance of the appellant is with
regard to award of low marks to his daughter.
3. The facts narrated by learned counsel for the appellant show
that his daughter could not take certain examinations due to blockage
of the ID, resulting in award of lower grade. A challenge to the
blockage of ID with a prayer to permit her to take examination to get
her grade upgraded is not made. The prayer in the writ petition was
to clarify the marking scheme that resulted in awarding of low marks.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.400 of 2022
4. The prayer aforesaid was made without realizing that it was
the appellant's daughter who has not taken all the examinations,
which resulted in her securing lower grade. If the appellant's
daughter was deliberately not permitted to appear in the
examinations, a challenge to it should have been made by seeking
permission to appear in the examination, but without appearing in the
examination, the appellant could not have prayed for award of higher
marks.
Looking to the aforesaid, we do not find any error in the
judgment of the learned Single Judge and, accordingly, finding no
merit in the appeal, the same is dismissed. No costs.
(M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C., J.)
02.03.2022
Index : Yes/No
sasi
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.400 of 2022
To:
1.The Controller of Examiner, Central Board of Secondary Education (Regional Office), No.3, Old No.1630A J Block, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar, (Near Thirumangalam Signal) Behind Sridevi Hospital, Chennai-40.
2.The Vice Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, AFS, Avadi, Chennai-55.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.400 of 2022
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.400 of 2022
02.03.2022
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!