Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Muthusamy vs The Sub-Registrar
2022 Latest Caselaw 9899 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9899 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2022

Madras High Court
A.Muthusamy vs The Sub-Registrar on 13 June, 2022
                                                                                    S.A.No.208 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED :         13.06.2022

                                                            CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

                                                S.A.No.208 of 2020 and
                                                C.M.P.No.4196 of 2020

                     A.Muthusamy                        ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff

                                                             Vs.
                     1.The Sub-Registrar,
                       Sub-Registrar Office,
                       Perianaickenpalayam,
                       Coimbatore-35.        ... 1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent/1st Defendant

                     C. Soundaran (Deceased)
                                                    ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
                     2.S.Raghuram
                     3.S.Neelveni
                     4.Smt. Lalitha
                                             ...Respondent 2 to 4/LR's of Deceased 2nd Defendant

                     PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.45 of 2004
                     dated 09.08.2005 on the file of the Principal Sub Court at Coimbatore in
                     confirming the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.49 of 1994 dated
                     06.04.2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Coimbatore.


                                    For Appellant       :     M/s.R.S.Maitreya
                                    For Respondents :         Mr.T.R.Rajaraman [R.2 to R.4]



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     S.A.No.208 of 2020

                                                         JUDGMENT

The records in the above appeal would show that the appeal is filed

challenging the common Judgment passed in A.S.Nos.79 of 2004, 41 of

2004 and 45 of 2004 by the Principal Subordinate, Judge, Coimbatore

dated 09.08.2005. An appeal was filed against the Judgement in one of the

appeals viz; A.S.No.79 of 2004 in SA.SR.No.3424 of 2020 along with an

application to condone the delay of 5158 days in C.M.P.No.4438 of 2020.

This C.M.P. was dismissed after a detailed contest on 15.03.2022.

2. The records in this case would also indicate that the appeal has

been filed with a delay of 5158 days. It is also seen that the appellant has

filed an application to condone the delay in S.A.Sr.No.3424 of 2020 on

07.01.2020. However, this application was later not pressed by the

petitioner on 03.02.2020. A perusal of the certified copies of the Judgment

and Decree in A.S.No.45 of 2004 would indicate that the Judgment was

passed on 09.08.2005. The appellant has filed a copy of the application only

on 18.02.2019 and the copy has been made ready on 06.03.2019 and the

appeal has been filed on 07.01.2020. Therefore, on the face of the records it

is evident that the Second Appeal is hopelessly barred by limitation.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.208 of 2020

3. However, the Second Appeal has been numbered which is not in

order especially when the same has been filed with an inordinate delay.

Further appeal filed challenging the judgment and decree in the connected

appeal A.S.No.79 of 2004 also with a delay in SA.SR.No.3424 of 2020

having been dismissed the same would enure to this appeal as well.

4. Considering the fact that the appellant has not pressed the condone

delay petition, the appellant has given up a right to challenge the judgment

and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore in

A.S.No.45 of 2004. Consequently, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No

costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                                                                                            13.06.2022



                     Index             : Yes/No
                     Internet          : Yes/No
                     shr

                     To

1.The Principal Sub Court at Coimbatore.

2.The Principal District Munsif Court at Coimbatore.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.208 of 2020

P.T. ASHA, J, shr

S.A.No.208 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.4196 of 2020

13.06.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter