Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9814 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2022
S.A.No. 444 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No. 444 of 2005
1.K. Muthumari (died)
2.Saroja
3.Sakunthala
4.Vinayagamurthy
5.Neelakandan
6.Shanthi
7.Keerthana
8.Minor Mahi Prasath
(rep. by his mother and Guardian
the 6th appellant herein)
(Appellants 2 to 8 are brought on record
as LRs of the deceased sole appellant vide
Court order, dated 05.01.2021 made in CMP(MD).No.
6595 to 6597 of 2020 in SA(MD).No.444 of 2005) ... Appellants
Vs.
1.Natesan
2.Natarajan
3.Natesan
4.Mubarak John
5.Murugesan Mudaliar ... Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree
and Judgment, dated 20.01.2005 rendered in A.S.No.143 of 1997 on the file
of the Subordinate Judge, Trichirappalli, thereby confirming the decree and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/3
S.A.No. 444 of 2005
Judgment dated 17.07.1997 rendered in O.S.No.58 of 1988 on the file of the
District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, Trichy District.
For Appellants : Mr.Suriya Nayagam
For 1st Respondent : Mr.S. Anand Chandrasekar
for M/s. Sarvabhaman Associates
For respondents 2,4 and 5 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
It is seen from the records that the 3rd respondent died even in
the year 2021 and till date, no steps have been taken to implead the legal
heirs of the deceased 3rd respondent. Hence, the Second Appeal is
dismissed as abated. No costs.
09.06.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No trp
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Trichirappalli.
2. The District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, Trichy District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No. 444 of 2005
R. HEMALATHA, J.,
trp
S.A.No. 444 of 2005
10.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!