Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9739 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2022
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
J.M.Elangovan ... Petitioner
Versus
C.Saranya ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of
Cr.P.C, to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 06.10.2021 made in
M.C.No.23 of 2019 on the file of the Family Court, Villupuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Chandru
For Respondent : No Appearance
ORDER
This Revision Case is filed as against the order of the Family Court,
Villupuram, dated 06.10.2021 in M.C.No.23 of 2019, whereby, the Family
Court had awarded a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance to the
respondent/wife.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that there was absolutely no justification on behalf of the wife to live
separately and already, at the Village Panchayat she agreed that the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
marriage to be dissolved by mutual consent and taken her jewels and
Rs.2,00,000/- as cash and had undertaken not to claim any maintenance
whatsoever. Inspite of it, the respondent/wife had retracted and therefore,
the petitioner/husband had already filed a divorce petition and a Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal, arising out of the proceedings are pending. The
respondent/wife has now belatedly filed this application and without any
proof as to the income, the Trial Court has taken Rs.40,000/- per month
and has fixed an exorbitant amount of Rs.20,000/- as maintenance.
3. Even though notice was sent, the respondent/wife had returned the
same as unclaimed and therefore, already the service has been treated as
complete and today, when the matter came up for hearing, there is no
representation on behalf of the respondent/wife. As a matter of fact, the
interim order already granted by this Court was also produced before the
Family Court and therefore, the respondent/wife is in the knowledge of the
proceedings.
4. I have considered the submissions made on behalf of the learned
Counsel for the petitioner and perused the material records of the case.
The petitioner is duty bound to maintain the respondent/wife. The Trial https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
Court had taken the monthly income as Rs.40,000/- and however, fixed a
sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance. As per the dictum of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Kalyan Dey Chowdhury Vs. Rita Dey
Chowdhury Nee Nandy [(2017) 14 SCC 200], fixing of monthly
maintenance at 25% of the income would be just and fair and therefore, I
hold that fixing of a sum of Rs.20,000/- is on the higher side and therefore,
I am inclined to modify the same as Rs.10,000/- per month and
accordingly, this Revision Case is ordered as follows:-
(i) The order of the Family Court, Villupuram, dated 06.10.2021 in
M.C.No.23 of 2019 is modified that the petitioner shall pay monthly
maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent/wife on or before
5th day of every English Calendar month;
(ii) In all other respects, the order of the Trial Court is confirmed;
(iii) Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.13692 of 2021 is closed.
09.06.2022 Index : yes/no Speaking/Non-speaking order grs
To
The Family Court, Villupuram.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
grs
Crl.R.C.No.889 of 2021
09.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!