Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9554 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
Bharath Govindaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Old Municipality Building,
1st Floor, Avadi,
Chennai - 600 054.
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
SRMC Police Station,
72, Pillayar Koil St, Moovendhar Nagar,
Lakshmi Nagar, Porur,
Chennai - 600 125.
3.The Inspector of Police,
T-14, Mangadu Police Station,
Mangadu,
Chennai - 600 122. ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct
the respondents to take up the complaint sent on 16.05.2022 intimating about
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
the complaint dated 15.02.2022 and subsequently direct the 3rd respondent to
register the FIR based on the complaint sent by the petitioner to the respondents
against one Bhavani.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mohana Krishnan
For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to
take up the complaint sent on 16.05.2022 intimating about the complaint dated
15.02.2022 and subsequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR based
on the complaint sent by the petitioner to the respondents against one Bhavani.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing
for the respondent submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner,
enquiry is pending in CSR No.289 of 2022.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
4. This petition is not maintainable, in view of the Order passed by a
Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The Superintendent
of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489. The Hon'ble Supreme
Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in
M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon
Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any
direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482
of Cr.P.C. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily
avail the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and
Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. Liberty is given to the petitioner to workout his
remedy as per the directions issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench in the order
referred supra.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed and a
direction is issued to the respondent police to conduct enquiry legally if prima
facie case is made out.
07.06.2022
rgi/shk Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
N. SATHISH KUMAR,J.
rgi/shk
To
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Old Municipality Building, 1st Floor, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, SRMC Police Station, 72, Pillayar Koil St, Moovendhar Nagar, Lakshmi Nagar, Porur, Chennai - 600 125.
3.The Inspector of Police, T-14, Mangadu Police Station, Mangadu, Chennai - 600 122.
4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2022
07.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!