Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9520 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2022
S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
and
M.P(MD).No.1 of 2011
Devi Ammal Silva .... Appellant/Appellant/2nd Defendant
Vs.
1.Terance Villavarayar
2.Mery Gomez
3.Immaculate
4.Reena
5.Peter Regan
6.Anu
7.Arwin
8.Darwin
9.Silvin
10.Flawin
11.Enastin ... Respondents/Respondents
1,4,6 to 14/1st Plaintiff-3rd Defendant-
LRs of the Deceased 4th Defendant nad 2nd Plaintiff
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil
Procedure, to set aside the decree and the judgment dated 17.08.2010
rendered in A.S.NO.31 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Judge
cum Fast Track Court No.1, Tuticorin confirming the decree and the
judgment dated 23.03.2006 rendered in O.S.No.17 of 1999 on the file of the
Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin by allowing this second appeal.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
For Appellant : No appearance
For R1 : Mr.M.P.Senthil
For R2 to R11 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The suit in O.S.No.17 of 1999 was laid by two plaintiffs to seek the
appointment of the first plaintiff as a Trustee to manage certain charities
created under a settlement deed dated 11.10.1941, by certain Soosai Lazar
Villavarayar. The suit is decreed successively both by the trial Court and
the First Appellate Court. The second defendant has preferred the present
appeal.
2. The learned counsel for the first respondent/plaintiff in the suit submitted
that the first plaintiff has passed away on 12.04.2019 and a memo to that
effect has been filed on 01.07.2019. He also added that the second
defendant is only a tenant of the property. The said statement is recorded.
Inasmuch as the first plaintiff/decree holder before the First Appellate Court
has passed away and inasmuch as the right sought is one for office, nothing
can survive beyond the date of death of the first plaintiff.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
3. Having said that, the appellant has not taken any steps to implead such
successor to the office to sustain this appeal. There is no representation for
the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected M.P(MD).No.1 of 2011 is closed.
07.06.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmk/cm
To
1.The Additional District Judge cum Fast Track Court No.1, Tuticorin.
2.The Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
rmk/cm
S.A(MD).No.174 of 2011
07.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!