Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9477 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2022
W.A.No.1262 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.06.2022
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice PARESH UPADHYAY
and
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.A.No.1262 of 2022
and C.M.P. No.7965 of 2022
1.The Director of Medical Services,
Directorate of Medical Services,
Chennai – 6.
2.The Director,
Institute of Mental Health,
Medavakkam Tank Road,
Kilpauk, Chennai – 10. ..Appellants
Vs
1.A.Ponnan
2.K.Pushparaj .. Respondents
Appeal preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the
order dated 16.08.2013 in W.P.No.7406 of 2007.
For Appellants : Mr.V.Nanmaran,
Addl. Govt. Pleader
For Respondents : Mr.M.Stanley Chellappa
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1262 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.)
Challenge in this appeal is made to the order dated 16.08.2013
recorded on W.P. No.7406 of 2007. This appeal is by the respondent /
State Authorities in the writ petition.
2. Learned single Judge has in exercise of his discretion under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India granted certain benefit to the
writ petitioner based on some similarly situated person.
3. Mr.V.Nanmaran, learned Additional Government Pleader has
submitted that the learned single Judge was in error while granting
relief to the writ petitioners since the posts on which the writ
petitioners were appointed were not sanctioned posts. It is submitted
that the order of learned single Judge be interfered with.
4. Having heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for
the appellants and having considered the material on record, we find
as under:
4.1 The matter is listed as a fresh matter today. The challenge is
to the order of learned single Judge dated 16.08.2013. About a decade
has passed by this time. Though technically delay might have been
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1262 of 2022
condoned, fact remains that in intra-court appeal, in exercise of power
under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, the discretion exercised by learned
single Judge before about a decade, that too in favour of some poor
persons need not be interfered with.
4.2 There is an additional reason not to interfere in this matter.
The learned single Judge, on the basis of the material on record found
that the writ petitioners were working as sanitary workers and has
granted the benefit from the date on which they were otherwise
entitled to. We do not find any error in exercise of discretion by the
learned single Judge and further even if there was some scope, after
about a decade, the same could not be interfered with.
5. For the reasons recorded above, this writ appeal is dismissed.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(P.U., J) (V.B.S., J)
06.06.2022
Index:No
mmi/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1262 of 2022
PARESH UPADHYAY, J.
and
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
mmi
W.A.No.1262 of 2022
06.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!