Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11643 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
C.M.A.(MD)No.1266 and 1267 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 30.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1266 and 1267 of 2014
and
M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 2 of 2014
1. Chandra
2. N.Jothilakshmi
3. N.Muthuramalingam
4. N.Murugan
5. N.Ganapathy
6. N.Devilakshmi
7. N.Sakthivel
(cause title accepted vide order, dated 27.06.2014
made in MP(MD)Nos.1 & 1/2014)
... Appellants in both CMAs
Vs.
1. Mohammed Hakkeem
2. Abubakkar Sithik
3. Fatima Beevi
4. Bava sikkandhar @ Kalaiman Boi ... Respondents in both CMAs
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD)No.1266 and 1267 of 2014
Prayer in CMA(MD)No.1266 of 2014 : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
filed under Section 104 r/w. Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil
Procedure, against the fair and executable order, dated 29.01.2014, passed in
A.S.No.92 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge,
Tirumangalam Camp Court reversing the judgment and decree, passed in
O.S.No.119 of 1999, dated 22.02.2011, on the file of the District Munsif,
Tirumangalam and remanding the case to the trial Court.
Prayer in CMA(MD)No.1267 of 2014 : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
filed under Section 104 r/w. Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil
Procedure, against the fair and executable order, dated 29.01.2014, passed in
A.S.No.93 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge,
Tirumangalam Camp Court reversing the judgment and decree, passed in
O.S.No.267 of 2001, dated 22.02.2011, on the file of the District Munsif,
Tirumangalam and remanding the case to the trial Court.
(In both CMAs)
For Appellants : Mr.N.Vallinayagam
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.M.M.Iqbal
COMMON JUDGMENT
These Appeals are filed against the order, dated 29.01.2014,
passed in A.S.Nos.92 and 93 of 2011, on the file of the Additional
Subordinate Judge, Tirumangala Camp Court reversing the judgment and
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD)No.1266 and 1267 of 2014
decree, passed in O.S.No.119 of 1999 and O.S.No.267 of 2001, dated
22.02.2011, on the file of the District Munsif, Tirumangalam and remanding
the case to the trial Court.
2. On the side of the appellants, it is stated that these appeals were
filed against the order of remand, whereas, the case was remanded to the
lower Court and the suits were already disposed of and appeals against the
suits were also disposed of and the appeals become infructuous.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the
appellants, these appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
30.06.2022
Ls
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID – 19 pandemic, a
web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring
that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the
responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD)No.1266 and 1267 of 2014
R. THARANI, J.
Ls
To
1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirumangalam Camp Court.
2.The District Munsif, Tirumangalam.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Judgment made in C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1266 and 1267 of 2014
30.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!