Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11330 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022
W.P.No.16160 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
W.P. No.16160 of 2022
R.Gomathy Devi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District,
Erode.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Sathyamangalam Police Station,
Erode District.
3. M.Prabhushankar
4. Geetha
5. N.Manoranjitham
6.T.Josehpeen Jeneetha ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to direct
second respondent to take action against 3 to 6 respondent and to conduct
enquiry and file a First Information Report (FIR) based on the petitioner
complaint dated 02.11.2021.
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.16160 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Manikandhan
For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to direct
second respondent to take action against third to sixth respondent and to
conduct enquiry and file a First Information Report (FIR) based on the
petitioner complaint dated 02.11.2021.
2. The grievances of the petitioner is that the petitioner had made a
complaint, on 20.11.2021 as against the third to sixth respondent. Till now,
the respondent Police did not conduct enquiry and had registered the First
Information Report.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
respondent.
4. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16160 of 2022
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge
Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after
relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court
cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intrevene
only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of
the fact that the complaint is now pending and not been enquired, the
Investigation Offier is directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct
enquiry as directed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari
Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any
cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is bound to register
the FIR otherwise they may close the complaint. Such exercise shall be
completed within a period of two weeks from today.
5. In view of the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.No
costs.
28.06.2022
Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No nti/dhk
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16160 of 2022
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
nti/dhk
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode.
2. The Inspector of Police, Sathyamangalam Police Station, Erode District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
W.P. No.16160 of 2022
28.06.2022
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!