Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11200 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022
C.R.P.(PD)No.1956 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
C.R.P.(PD).No.1956 of 2022
and
C.M.P.No.9912 of 2022
1.Global Finsol Private Limited,
Rep.by its Managing Director,
4-A, Sri Ayyappa Arcade Pampa Lay-out,
Kemapura, Hebbal,
Bangalure-560 024.
2.M.N.Jahannath ... Petitioners
..Vs..
Sri Ragava Exporter,
Rep.by its Proprietor,
C.Hemanathan,
32, Kulathur, Mukasi,
Anuvanpalli Village and Post
Modakuruchi Taluk,
Erode District 638 101 ... Respondent
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, by setting aside the judgment and decree dated
Page No.1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(PD)No.1956 of 2022
04.03.2022 passed in I.A.No.242 of 2021 in O.S.No.42 of 2018 on the
file of the Principal District Court, Erode.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saravanakumar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred challenging the
order dated 04.03.2022 made in I.A.No.242 of 2021 in O.S.No.42 of
2018 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the
materials available on record.
3. The revision petitioners are the defendants against whom the
respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.42 of 2018 for recovery of
money. During the pendency of the suit, the defendants filed I.A.No.242
of 2021, to reject the plaint as not maintainable. The said application
was dismissed. Aggrieved over the same, this Civil Revision Petition has
been preferred.
Page No.2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)No.1956 of 2022
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the suit
averments it is stated that the last part payment was made in the year
2015 and the suit was filed in the year 2018 ; and hence, the suit itself is
clearly barred by limitation. However, the learned trial Judge over
looked the above facts and dismissed the petition by observing that the
point of limitation is a mixed question of law.
5. On perusal of the pleadings in the plaint, it is seen that the
respondent/plaintiff has specifically alleged that the last part payment
was made on 06.01.2015. The respondent/plaintiff has managed to file
the suit on the verge of expiry of limitation i.e on 05.01.2018. Hence, it is
right for the learned trial Judge to render a finding that the plaint is not
liable to be rejected at the threshold itself. As such, I feel it does not
require any interference.
6. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed and the
order dated 04.03.2022 made in I.A.No.242 of 2021 in O.S.No.42 of
Page No.3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)No.1956 of 2022
2018 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Erode is hereby
confirmed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
27.06.2022
Index:Yes No Speaking Order:Yes/No ms
To
The Principal District Munsif, Erode.
Page No.4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)No.1956 of 2022
R.N.MANJULA, J.
ms
C.R.P.(PD).No.1956 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.9912 of 2022
27.06.2022
Page No.5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!