Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11084 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10431 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
CRL.O.P (MD) No.10431 of 2022
Aswin Shibu,
: Petitioner
Vs
1. The State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Eraniel Police Station,
Kanyakumari District.
(Crime No.344/2018).
2. Elvin Vinix,
: Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
praying to call for records in C.C.No.165 of 2022, on the file of the learned
Judicial Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari district and quash the same as
against this petitioner.
For petitioner : M/s.Russel Raj R,
For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R2 : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10431 of 2022
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the Charge
Sheet in C.C.No. 165 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial
Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, for the offences punishable under
Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 427, 323, 379, 506(2), 149 and 324 of IPC,
in Crime No.344 of 2018.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the
petitioner and the other accused persons abused the petitioner with filthy
language, attacked him, caused injury, snatched his cell phone and
threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the complaint.
3.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have decided
to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among
themselves.
4. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court
which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10431 of 2022
also by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the second respondent
were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by
Mr.Kathiravan, SSI of Police, Eraniel Police Station. This Court also
enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an
amicable settlement between themselves.
5. In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the
parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter,
the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under
Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 427, 323, 379, 506(2), 149 and 324 of IPC.
6. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in (2012)10 SCC
303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath)
reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.
7. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments of
the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the
proceedings in C.C.No.165 of 2022 pending before the learned Judicial
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10431 of 2022
Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, even though, the offences
involved are not compoundable in nature.
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as
a sequel, the proceedings in C.C.No.165 of 2022 pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari District is quashed and the terms
of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.
24.06.2022 Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no lr
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10431 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
lr
ORDER IN CRL.O.P (MD) No.10431 of 2022
24.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!