Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B.Chandrasekar vs The District Collector
2022 Latest Caselaw 11057 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11057 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022

Madras High Court
B.Chandrasekar vs The District Collector on 24 June, 2022
                                                                                   W.P.No.16495 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 24.06.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
                                                W.P.No.16495 of 2020
                                      and W.M.P.Nos.20471 of 2020 & 1579 of 2021

                  B.Chandrasekar                                               .. Petitioner
                                                            Vs.

                  1. The District Collector,
                     Chennai District.

                  2. The Director,
                     Department of Social Welfare &
                      Nutritious Meal Programme,
                     Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

                  3. The District SC and ST Welfare Officer,
                     Chennai - 1.                                              .. Respondents

                  Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                  India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the
                  representation of the petitioner dated 31.01.2018, on the file of the 3rd
                  respondent and direct the respondents to remove the deemed suspension as
                  prolonged and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with
                  all consequential monetary and service benefits in view of the Judgment in
                  Ajaykumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India reported in (2015) 7 SCC 291 and
                  judgment of this Court in W.P.No.23238 of 2020, dated 06.03.2020.

                                    For Petitioner          : Mr.B.Chandrasekar

                                    For Respondent          : Mr.T.Chezhiyan
                                                              A.G.P.
                                                          -----

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  1/5
                                                                                 W.P.No.16495 of 2020

                                                      ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of

Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to revoke the petitioner's

suspension order dated 21.12.2015 by considering the petitioner's

representation dated 31.01.2018.

2. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as a Cook under the

third respondent on 01.10.2011 and while in service, on 01.11.2015, a FIR

was slapped on the petitioner for offences under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL

Act, r/w Section 506(ii) of IPC in F.I.R.No.760 of 2015. After filing of the

FIR, the petitioner was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody. In view

of the criminal case pending against the petitioner he was placed under

suspension from 21.12.2015.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the criminal case and he has not

committed any grave offence as alleged by the respondent. The learned

Counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner has been

placed under prolonged suspension by the respondent to demoralize the

petitioner and therefore, he seeks for revocation of the order of suspension. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.16495 of 2020

4. The respondents have filed counter. The learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that due to the

pendency of the criminal case, the petitioner has been placed under

suspension and he was paid 50% subsistence allowance till April, 2016 and

steps taken to pay 75% of salary from 01.05.2016.

5. I have considered the aforesaid submission made by the learned

counsel on either side and also perused the records carefully.

6. The petitioner has been placed under prolonged suspension due to

the pendency of the criminal case. In view of the above, it requires for

reconsideration of the revocation of the suspension order, as no further

action has been taken by the department, for initiating disciplinary

proceedings. Therefore, this Court is of the view that as the petitioner is

placed under prolonged suspension, his suspension has to be revoked and

accordingly revoked. The respondents are directed to place the petitioner in

any non-sensitive post as per their choice, within a period of four weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed

of with the above direction. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.16495 of 2020

petitions are closed. No costs.

24.06.2022

Index: Yes / No kk

To

1. The District Collector, Chennai District.

2. The Director, Department of Social Welfare & Nutritious Meal Programme, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3. The District SC and ST Welfare Officer, Chennai - 1.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.16495 of 2020

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

kk

W.P.No.16495 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.20471 of 2020 & 1579 of 2021

24.06.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter