Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11047 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8443 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
CRL.O.P (MD) No.8443 of 2022
1. Navaneethakannan,
2. G.Perumalsamy @ Perumal,
3. P.Parvathy,
: Petitioners
Vs
1. The State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Vembakkottai Police Station
in Crime Nos.132/22, 32/2022.
2. S.Yogalakshmi,
: Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
praying to call for the records in Crime.No.132/2021 dated 20.04.2021, on
the file of the Vembakkottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District and
quash the same.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8443 of 2022
For Petitioners : M/s. Mahalakshmi S,
For R1 : Mr.A.Albert James,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R2 : Mr.S.Rajesh
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in
Crime.No.132/2021 dated 20.04.2021, on the file of the Vembakkottai
Police Station, Virudhunagar District
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the
petitioners quarreled with the defacto complainant, attacked and threatened
her with dire consequences. Hence the complaint.
3.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time,
the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute
amicably among themselves.
4.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8443 of 2022
which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and
also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent
were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by
Mr.K.Gopalakrishnan, SSI of Police, Vembakkottai Police Station as well
as by the learned Counsels appearing on both the sides. This Court also
enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an
amicable settlement between themselves.
5.In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the
parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter,
the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under
Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu
Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002.
6.The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in (2012)10 SCC
303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath) reported
in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8443 of 2022
7.In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments of
the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the
proceedings in Crime No.132 of 2021 pending before the first respondent
police, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature.
8.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a
sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.132 of 2021 on the file of the first
respondent police, is quashed insofar as the petitioners alone and the terms
of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.
24.06.2022 Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no lr
To
1. The Inspector of Police, Vembakkottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8443 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
lr
ORDER IN CRL.O.P (MD) No.8443 of 2022
24.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!